- 1、本文档共48页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
万方数据
万方数据
Abstract
Small and medium enterprises are constrained by financing problem though play an more and more important role in the economic development. So the small and medium enterprises can develop well only when the financing difficulty is solved. Many scholars tried from many aspects including self-liquidating credit chain financing, the one that is effective, easy to implement and able to realize multi-wins. This article explains the characteristics and feasibility of self-liquidating credit chain financing qualitatively and quantitatively. And then consider the affect of participants’ fairness preference on the decision makers’ decision making and expected effect by combining the FB model in behavior economics.
Firstly, consider the supply chain including one retailer(is a small and medium
enterprise and faces financing difficulty) and one supplier(a big company) based on the news vendor model. Assume that the retailer’s effort level can influence the market requirement. It is proved by the model and example analysis that the capital-restricted retailer will pay more effort and high the order quantity if he can get loan from banks, which results in higher expected effect of all participants.
Then consider the influence of participants’ fairness preference on the decision making and expected effect. FS model believes that the decision maker not only consider its own effect but also consider other participants’ effect when he makes decisions. In the fourth chapter, three models separately considering the retailer’s fairness preference, the supplier’s fairness preference and both the retailer’s and the supplier’s fairness preference are established. From qualitative and quantitative analysis it is obvious that when the retailer’s fairness preference is considered, though the supplier’s optimal buyback price is lower, the retailer’s effort level and order quantity are increased, which results in the higher expected effect of the retailer, the supplier an
您可能关注的文档
- 毛冬青总黄酮对脑缺血动物模型的影响-中药学专业毕业论文.docx
- 面向模块化移动机器人的无线自组网控制系统研究-机械工程专业毕业论文.docx
- 煤炭企业领域软件过程量化管理方法与模型研究-计算机应用技术专业毕业论文.docx
- 考虑批量的柔性车间调度研究与实现-机械工程专业毕业论文.docx
- 美时佳花茶包装设计-工业设计工程专业毕业论文.docx
- 罗茨鼓风机性能优化和内部流场的数值分析-机械电子工程专业毕业论文.docx
- 面向云计算环境的虚拟机在线迁移机制研究-计算机软件与理论专业毕业论文.docx
- 慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者急性加重期及稳定期血清Th17Treg相关细胞因子与肺功能、生活质量(CAT评分)的相关性分析-内科学专业毕业论文.docx
- 民警培训考核信息管理系统的设计与实现-软件工程专业毕业论文.docx
- 黄秋葵果实石油醚部位的化学成分研究-药物化学专业毕业论文.docx
文档评论(0)