Infinite- Models-for- Propositional- Calculi课件.pptVIP

Infinite- Models-for- Propositional- Calculi课件.ppt

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
The Proof Ix IIx IIIx … IIIIIIx III…Ix … Suppose M “thinks” that IIx = IIIIIIx. * 。 The Proof Ix IIx IIIx … IIIIIIx III…Ix … Suppose M “thinks” that IIx = IIIIIIx. Then according to M: CIIIIIIxIIx = Cxx, which is a theorem. * 。 The Proof According to M: CIIIIIIxIIx = Cxx, which is a theorem. Now consider: CCIIIIIIxIIxy=CCIIII(IIx)(IIx)y, which is of the form: CCIII…IXXY, which is a theorem (where X=IIx). * 。 The Proof According to M: CIIIIIIxIIx = Cxx, which is a theorem. Now consider: CCIIIIIIxIIxy=CCIIII(IIx)(IIx)y, which is of the form: CCIII…IXXY, which is a theorem (where X=IIx). So one application of modus ponens yields y. Therefore, the model must validate everything. * 。 What Happened? Finite matrix models must “identify” two elements of any sufficiently long list of formulae. So it will incorrectly think that when those formulae are combined, the resulting formula will be equivalent to Cxx. No finite matrix model validates exactly the instances of Cxx (G?del). If Cxx is a theorem, then the model will validate the formula. * 。 How to Use a Matrix Model 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 CpCqq p q q * 。 How to Use a Matrix Model 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 CpCqq p q q 1 2 2 1 1 * 。 Finite Matrices as Finite Automata Using a finite matrix model is like letting an automaton run over a tree. “Designated Values” are like “Accept States”. CpCqq p q q 1 2 2 1 1 * 。 The Disanalogy -- Vocabulary Finite tree automata have a finite input language. Logics have an infinite language with countably many variables. This matters for models, but not for countermodels. * 。 Restricting the Input Vocabulary Suppose {Cpq, r}?s, by condensed detachment, and suppose s has fewer distinct variables than one of the premises. Then there is a substitution ? such that: ?p= ?r; ?q=s, and ?Cpq and ?r have no variables not appearing in s. Therefore, if P is a set of premises, and there is a proof of C from P, then there is a proof of C from P containing only variables occurring in C. * 。 * . . * . . * . . * . . * . .

文档评论(0)

liuxiaoyu99 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档