六种修复材料与天然牙牙釉质摩擦磨耗性能比较的实验研究-口腔临床医学专业论文.docxVIP

浙江大学同等学力硕士学位论文合金组，D金钯合金组，B钛合金组，F牙用陶瓷组，G天然牙牙釉质组。 浙江大学同等学力硕士学位论文 合金组，D金钯合金组，B钛合金组，F牙用陶瓷组，G天然牙牙釉质组。 各组数据经方差分析和两两比较得出：G组(天然牙釉质)最小，但与F 组(瓷块)差别无统计学意义(PO．05)，与其余各组均有显著性差异 (P0．01)．h组(纯钛)最大，与其余各组均有显著性差异(PO．01)，B 钛合金组与其余各组，D组(金钯合金)与其余各组均有显著性差异 (P0．01)。瓷块的磨擦系数稳定在0．68，银汞合金的摩擦系数在0．11， 金钯合金的摩擦系数在0．09，镍镉合金在0．4l，纯钛在0．38，钛合金在 O．48，天然牙釉质在0．65。 结论：1．六种修复材料的耐磨性均低于天然牙釉质，纯钛、银汞合 金及镍铬合金的耐磨性最小，金钯合金及钛合金次之，陶瓷的耐磨性最 大。 2．陶瓷与牙釉质的摩擦系数最大，金钯合金与银汞合金的 摩擦系数最小。 3．金钯合金与银汞合金的摩擦系数证明两者不适合做咬合 面的修复材料(摩擦力太小，易打滑)。 关键词：磨耗；摩擦系数；牙釉质，陶瓷，金钯合金，银汞合金， 纯钛，钛合金，镍铬合金 浙江大学同等学力硕士学位论文Abstract 浙江大学同等学力硕士学位论文 Abstract objective：The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the wear of six kinds of dental materials that was widely used clinically． The wear mechanisms were discussed to provide experental reference for selecting proper restorative material to protect opposite natural enamel of patient． Methods：1)．Experimental groups：Pure Ti，Ti alloy，Au—Pd alloy，Ni—Cr alloy，AgHg alloy，ceramic were fabricated into thirty uniform 8．0x8．0x2．0mm3 block． Five specimens in each group．2)．Control group：Five recently extracted mandibular third molar of adults were fabricated into 8．0 x 8．0x 2．0ram3 block．31．Steatites were fabricated into discs in the diameter of 25．0mm and thickness of 2．Omm to act as counter sample materials．41．The mass loss of each specimen and the opposing steatite were weighted by electric balance． 5、．The volume loss of the materials and opposing steatites were analyzed by SPSS 1 1．5 and the difference was compared． Results：1．The volume loss of specimens from group A to group G was：The ranking of the volume loss of six materials and enamel from the most to the least was：group A，group E，group C，group D， group B，group F，group G．The significant difference was found between group A and the other groups(P0．01)．No significance Was found between group Gand F．The coefficient of friction of A—G：0．68． O．1 1，O．09，0．41，O．38，0．48，O．65 respectively． Conelusions：1)．The six materials were less resistant to wear than 浙江大学同等学力硕士