论当事人的民事诉权保护-法律专业论文.docxVIP

摘 摘 要 诉权理论与当事人理论、举证责任理论共同构成民事诉讼理论 的三大基石，其重要性勿庸置疑。19世纪以来，大陆法系国家对诉 权理论进行了比较充分的研究，但是我国至今对此仍然缺乏足够的 重视，因此我国长期而普遍地存在诉权保护不足的问题。 本文先从诉权的基本理论入手，探讨诉权的内涵、要件、功能， 将诉权定位于一种宪法上的权利，进而分析当事人适格、诉的利益 问题，肯定诉权启动和制约司法权、保护和创设权利的功能。在此 基础上，对我国诉权保护的现状及原因进行分析，一个现状是公民 肩动司法程序难，主要原因是可诉范围受到限制和起诉条件较为苛 刻；另一个现状是公民使用司法程序的成本高，主要原【鲴是司法公 正、审判效率、诉讼费用制度等方面存在诸多问题。针对我国诉权 保护的现状，本文最后尝试提出改革设计，一是根据《公民权利和 政治权利公约》对法院的依法设置和公正、公开的审判进行研究， 进而刚释司法最终审查权问题，探讨如何放宽对当事人诉权行使的 限制，主要目的是要解决便-丁公民肩动诉讼程序的问题；二是对法 律援助、诉讼保险、诉讼费用等问题进行研究，同时探讨构建多元 化的诉讼程序选择机制的可能性，试图解决如何保证公民用得起诉 讼程序的问题。 关键词：诉权保护公正审判诉讼救济 AbstractLitigious Abstract Litigious right theory,which is very important，together with litigant theory and lodging proof theory,is fundamental of civil litigation． Since 19“century,civil law country has been doing full research into litigious right theory．But our country hasn’t paid much attention to it yet． So the problem of litigious right protection shortage does exist in our country chronically and commonly． This thesis，beginning with the basic theory of litigious right， discusses it’s content，component and function；putting the litigious fight theory down as a constitutional right．The thesis also analyses the present status(“can’t go on”，“can not use”)and affirms the litigious right’s function of starting and restricting the jurisdiction，protecting and activating the right．Based on this，the paper mainly analyses the two present situations of litigious right protection and their respective reasons． 1．The citizen has difficulty in staring the jurisdiction proceeding，the reason of which is because the litigant area is limited and the prosecuting condition is rigorous．2．Tile cost the citizen spend on the jurisdiction is very high，the reason of which is because that there are many problems in the systems ofjurisdiction justice，trial efficiency and legal cost etc。In the end，the paper offers two ways of reforming according to the present status of litigious right protection．One is researching legal settings and just trials of court accord