论建立我国刑事证据开示制度-诉讼法学专业论文.docxVIP

摘要我国修改后的刑事诉讼法采用了部分案件材料移送式起诉方 摘要 我国修改后的刑事诉讼法采用了部分案件材料移送式起诉方 式，这一改革对于避免法官先入为主，产牛预断具有积极意义，但 由于制度设计上的缺陷，与新起诉方式相配套的证据开示制度未能 与之同步建立，导致在实践中H_}现了新的问题，其中最为突出的就 是辩护律师阅卷权的行使受到阻碍，使得与之相关的庭审程序改革 难以取得人们所期望的效果。由此引起了我国法学理论界与司法实 践界人士对证据开示制度的极大关注，并对该项制度进行了理论研 究和实践尝试，但切合我国实际的具体方案尚在探索之中。目前， 国际上证据开示制度出现了，强化双向开示及扩大控方开示范围的 趋势，这些趋势是我国在建立该项制度时应予以考虑的。本文以证 据开示的概念和理论基础为出发点，考察评析了具有代表性的几国 证据开示制度，为解决我国的实际问题提供可资借攀的资料，并从 摆脱目前证据交流不畅现状、完善诉讼结构、加强对被告人权利保 护、减轻法官庭审压力等几个方面论证了建立我圈证据开示制度的 必要性，然后结合日本以及目前民事诉讼中的实践经验、控辩双方 的态度、我国目前的尝试、法律界对该项制度的研讨，分析了建立 我国证据开示制度的可行性，最后对我国证据开示制度应遵循的原 ·则和具体开示程序的设置提出r设想。 关键词：证据开示起诉J与‘式对抗制公诉人辩护律师 AbstractThe Abstract The amended criminal procedure law of our country adopted the new model of prosecution．in which only partial materials should be transferred．This reform has significance of preventing the iudge from preconceptions．But，because of the defects in the design of the systems，the system of discovery of evidence which is necessary to the new model of prosecution hasn’t been established at the same time．It led to the arising of new problems in practice，the most prominent one among them is the obstacle which obstructs the defense attorney to review files，and as a result，the refonn in trial system hasn’t worked as expected．In this condition，the system of discovery of evidence has attracted much aRention of both the academic circles and the iudicial organizations，who have carried on theoretical research and put it into practice．But the concrete scheme that meets our country’S needs iS still in question．At present，the trends of strengthening the reciprocal discovery and extending the limits to the evidences discovered by prosecutor has emerged in the world，which are the factors should be considered in our country．The thesis started from the concept and the theoretical basis of the discovery of evidence，then studied and observed the typical systems of discovery of evidence in several countries to offer the materials for solving the practical problems in our country．After