论行政诉讼第三人的认定-法律学专业论文.docxVIP

摘要行政诉讼第三人的认定是行政诉讼第三人制度中尤为重要的一个理论问题，是研 摘要 行政诉讼第三人的认定是行政诉讼第三人制度中尤为重要的一个理论问题，是研 究第三人制度中其他问题的基础，具有十分重要的理论与实践意义。 我国行政诉讼法中虽然将行政诉讼第三人制度以法律的形式予以确认，但通过对 现有具体条文进行深入剖析就会发现，我图行政诉讼第三人的认定尚显粗疏和笼统。 如我囡《行政诉讼法》第27条规定：“同提起诉讼的具体行政行为有利害关系的公民、 法人或其他组织，可以作为第三人申请参加诉讼，或者由人民法院通知参加诉讼。” 由此，我们只能依据本条规定做为认定第三人的标准，即行政诉讼第三人只能是 “同提起诉讼的具体行政行为有利害关系的公民、法人或其他组织。”而此标准明显 过于简单，可操作性不强，使得理沦界对于第三人的认定也是争议不断。立法一L的缺 失与理论上的纷争导致在司法实务中，错列、乱列第三人的情况屡见不鲜，因此对我 困的行政诉讼第三人认定制度的研究与完善尤为必要。 本文尝试从行政诉讼第三人制度的设立目的为出发点，分析我围行政诉讼第三人 认定中存在的问题，并随之对我国第三人认定制度的完善提出合理化建}义。 关键词：行政诉讼第三人；行政诉讼当事人 - AbstractAbstract Abstract Abstract The cognizance of administrative litigation is especially important theory problem in the administrative litigation system of the third party and is also the basement of it，which plays very important role in the theory and practice． Even though the administrative litigation system of the third party has been confirmed in country’s administrative procedural law,we also find it is still explicit and deficient general through specific provision for existing in-depth analysis．As the administrative litigation law in article 27 regulations：”with lawsuit specific administrative act has interests of citizens，legal persons other organizations may play third party applications to participate in the litigation，or the people’s court shall notify the to participate in the litigation．” Thus，we only according to the provisions the standard to identify the third party,so the cognizance of administrative litigation is the”third party only who has interests in specific administrative act of citizen，legal person other organization．”Obviously this standard is too simple and the maneuverability is not strong，which results in the cognizance of the theoretical circle dispute continuously．The lack of top legislation and theoretical disputes caused wrong column and the third person situation disorderly listed in the juridical practice of country,so common occurrence of administrative litigation of third party identification system resear