论我国民事二审程序中原审原告的撤回起诉权-民事诉讼法专业论文.docxVIP

论我国民事二审程序中原审原告的撤回起诉权-民事诉讼法专业论文.docx

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
审中撤回起诉,但也应当完善一些配套的制度设计以实现对其二审撤回起诉权的 限制适用。最后从制度设计层面对我国民事二审中原审原告撤回起诉权的正当程 序性构建提出了一些具体的完善之策。 关键字:民事诉讼 二审程序 原审原告 撤回起诉权 - - 2 Abstract Dropped as the parties the right to dispose of a lawsuit behavior, is a reflection of the autonomy of the parties in the proceedings. Therefore, in order to respect and show the dominant position of parties in civil litigation, Either in Chinese civil litigation theory or in the other country’s of the world, The system of withdrawal is an extremely important piece of litigation. In China, due to the insufficient and imperfect legislation, our system of civil withdrawal has many flaws and shortcomings, among which the problem whether the plaintiff enjoying the right of nolle prosequi on the original judgment in the second-instance trial has long been a controversial topic in both theory and judicial practice sectors. Either the updated promulgation and implementation of the new code of civil procedure in 2012 or the previously old law, makes no explicit provision for this front issue. In view of this, Basing on two cases of judicial practice in a number of procedural issues which raised during the trials, this article attempts to carry out a comprehensive and systematic discussion on whether the plaintiff enjoying the right of nolle prosequi on the original judgment in the second-instance trial, in order to make contribution for perfecting Chinese system of civil withdrawalin future legislation and guiding judicial practice In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into the following four sections, a total of about 25,000 words: The first part is raising question——two case-law thinking. This section starts from two judicial practice cases in the first trial arising from the trial the plaintiff applied for a nolle prosequi in raised a number of procedural issues, and points out several different views and opinions existing in judicial practice, then the legal issue behind the present case, namely whether the pl

文档评论(0)

131****9843 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档