the mean endoscope holding score (P0.0001). There were no significant differences
among the surgical methods (P=0.902), the mean operative blood loss (P=0.696), the
mean postoperative hospital stay (P=0.658), and the mean interval of neighboring
procedures (P=0.099).
3. Multiple comparison revealed that the mean operative time of group 7, 8, 9, 10
were shorter than group 4, 5, 6, meanwhile the mean operative time of group 4, 5, 6 were
shorter than group 1, 2, 3. Moreover, the mean endoscope holding score of group 7, 8, 9,
10 were higher than group 4, 5, 6, and the mean endoscope holding score of group 4, 5, 6
were higher than group 1, 2, 3.
4. Linear regression analysis showed negative correlation between the operative time
and the case number (r= -0.746, P0.0001), positive correlation between the endoscope
holding score and the case number (r=0.765, P0.0001), positive correlation between the
mean operative time and the mean interval of neighboring procedures (r=0.777, P=0.008),
and negative correlation between the mean endoscope holding score and the mean interval
of neighboring procedures (r= -0.809, P=0.005).
Conclusion:
1.A specific learning curve for endoscope holder in ETCAA does exist.
2. The initial 30 cases composed the primary stage of the learning curve, and the
endoscope holder could enter the intermediate stage of the learning curve after about 30
cases and expect a learning curve of approximately 60 cases in order to achieve the
advanced stage.
3. Properly increasing the operating frequency would help shorten the learning curve
for endoscope holder.
4. In order to enhance the quality of operation and the confidence of endoscope
holder, it seems advisable for endoscope holder to select suitable c
原创力文档

文档评论(0)