职务发明奖酬合理性原则研究以日本专利法为借鉴.docVIP

职务发明奖酬合理性原则研究 以日 本专利法为借鉴 刘强徐充 中南大学法学院 ： 单位向发明人支付职务发明奖酬应当遵循合理性原则，从而实现两者Z间利益 的平衡。法院在适用该原则时，可以对当事人之间约定的奖酬进行事后审查，或 者在没有约定及约定不合理时予以事前认定。事后审查偏重于程序性规制，而事 前认定则偏重于实体性要求。我国应当借鉴日本经验，在《专利法》第四次修改 时进-步明确“合理利益”要求。为完善对当事人约定奖酬的审查，要改进合理 性原则的立法体例、充分尊重当事人约定奖酬的意思自治、明确约定奖酬合理性 审查的程序性标准。为提升合理奖酬的司法裁定质量，不应将法定标准作为合理 奖酬标准以及过度提高法定奖酬比例，应当明确认定合理奖酬数额的影响因素。 由此，可以保障单位与发明人双方围绕职务发明所享有的合理利益。 关键词： 职务发明;奖酬;合理性原则;事后审查;事前认定; ：刘强(1978-),男，湖南长沙人，法学博士，中南大学法学院教授， 主要研究方向:知识产权法； ：徐梵(1996-),男，山东青岛人，中南大学法学院木科牛，主要研 究方向：知识产权法 :2016-12-18 基金：中国法学会部级法学研究项日“职务发明奖酬法律问题研究” (CLS (2016) D132) Research on principle of reasonableness in the employee invention reward and remuneration: With reference to Japanese patent law LIU Qiang XU Peng School of Law, Central South University; Abstract： Employee invention unit should pay remuncreition for the inventor in accordance with the principle of reasonableness, thus achieving the balance between both interests. When applying the rules, the court can use posterior review over the reward of the contract between the parties, and prior cognizance when there is no con tract or the con tract being unreasonable. The posterior review emphasizes procedural regulation, while the prior cognizance stresses substantive requirements. China should learn from the experience of Japan, and further clarify the requirements of ulegitimate interestsv in the fourth amendment of ^patent 1 aw. ” For the review mechanism on consideration parties agreed to pay, the legislative style of rationality principle should be improved, respect the contract between partics，and clarify the procedure criteria to review its reasonableness. The rules of judicial recognition of the reasonable reward should not deem the legal award as reasonable, and determine the factors affecting the reasonable reward rather than over-increasing the proportion of legal award, ? Thus, we can protect the legitimate interests of both the unit and the inventor about the invention of the service. Keyword： employee invention; rewards and r