水上交通肇事的刑法分析与立法完善.pdfVIP

A b str a c t Sh ipp in g indu stry prosp erity at the sam e tim e, hum an error factors leading to m aritim e traffic accident increasingly frequ ent occurrence, som e of th em according to th e current crim inal law of C h ina shall b e subject to sp ecific acts of th e crim inal respon sib ility. B ut over th e years th e m aritim e traffic accident crim inal liab ility alw ays ex ist a lot of prob lem s, esp ecially in m aritim e v ictim s cau sed by th e m issing state w h ich is ex ist legal rules of th e deletion . T o cau se on es w h ereab ou ts is a m ystery w h eth er can b e tak en as a resu lt of dam age, and sh all b e inv estigated for crim inal resp on sib ility, th e law of our country shou ld b e con sidered carefully. H ere a long legal b lank in the jud icature practice different judges w ill cau se ones w h ereab outs is a m ystery (m issin g) the circum stan ces of d ifferent processing, or refer to th e death, or other circum stances, or not su e, an d un certainty ju dgm ent occurs frequ ently . A t present, som e accidents app eared d ifferent nature of the processing resu lts, w hen the traffic accident occur different p laces, su ch as in the road, in lan d w aters or sea area. Such prob lem s to m ake th e treatm en t o f traffic acciden ts b ecom e u nb alan ced , th e cu rren t crim in al law on th e statu s of standard un certainty, so in practice often app ear sim ilar cases but th e trial resu lt differen ce is v ery far, h am p er ju stice for stab ility, crim inal ju stice and h arm ony and stab ility of society brin gs a lot o f inconv en ien ce. In 1997 th e n ew crim in al law th e crim e of endan gerin g pub lic safety in th e ch apter the crim e of cau sin g traffic casu alties on ly prov ides for cau sing seriou s injury, death , accidents, and un specified oth er seriou s con sequ en ces, this has to say i