手动力支具在肌腱粘连治疗中的应用.doc

手动力支具在肌腱粘连治疗中的应用.doc

  1. 1、本文档共6页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
手部动力支具在多区肌腱损伤修复术后的应用* 罗桦杰1 詹晓欢1,2 高峻青1# 张家盛1 胡陶1 (1广东省佛山市中医院 佛山528000;2广州中医药大学 广东广州510405) 摘要:目的:探讨手部动力支具在多区肌腱修复术后的临床应用效果。方法:选取2016年6月~2018年6月我院收治的81例肌腱损伤患者作为研究对象,采用随机数表法分为支具组45例和对照组36例。支具组安装手部动力支具进行功能锻炼,并配合中药薰洗;对照组给予常规治疗,并配合中药薰洗。治疗后,用总主动活动度测定法(total active movement,TAM)评定患指肌腱修复后的功能。结果:随访3个月,支具组的综合优良率为87.9%高于对照组的63.9%,差异有统计学意义,P<0.05;支具组的二次松解手术发生率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义,χ2=3.854,P=0.048<0.05;两组均未发生不良反应。结论:手部动力支具能较明显地降低肌腱修复术后粘连的发生率和二次松解手术发生率,安全有效。 关键词:多区肌腱损伤;手部动力支具;中药薰洗;临床应用效果 Application of Hand Dynamic Brace After the Repair of Multi-area Tendon Injury* LUO Hua-jie1, ZHAN Xiao-huan1,2, GAO Jun-qing1#, ZHANG Jia-sheng1, HU Tao1 (1The Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Guangdong Province, Foshan528000; 2The Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou510405) Abstract: Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of hand dynamic Brace after the repair of Multi-area tendon injury. Methods: From June 2016 to June 2018, 81 patients with tendon injury in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups, with 45 cases in the brace group and 36 cases in the control group. In the brace group, hand power brace was installed for functional exercise and fumigated with traditional Chinese medicine, while in the control group, routine treatment was given and fumigated with traditional Chinese medicine, evaluated the function of tendon after repair by TAM (total active movement) after the treatment. Results: After 3 months follow-up, the comprehensive excellent and good rate of the brace group was 87.9% higher than that of the control group (63.9%), the difference was statistically significant, P0.05. And the rate of secondary release surgery in the brace group was significantly lower than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant, χ2=3.854, P=0.0480.05. There were no adverse reactions in both groups. Conclusion: the hand dynamic brace can obviously reduce The rate of adhesion after tendon repair and th

文档评论(0)

youbika + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档