地下工程结构不同楼盖形式的经济技术分析.docxVIP

地下工程结构不同楼盖形式的经济技术 分析 芮圣洁周文杰 浙江大学建筑工程学院 摘要： 地下工程结构设计过程屮，选择合理的楼盖形式是实现工程建设经济合理的重 要环节。研究了两种常见地下工程结构的楼盖(无梁楼盖和普通梁板式楼盖)， 选取了三种不同跨度(6m, 8m, 10m),在覆土 0. 5m,附加恒、活荷载为2. 5k N/m2的条件下，重点考虑了钢筋、混凝土及土方开挖的成本，通过对比发现:在 小跨度的条件下，无梁楼盖的造价较低，跨度较大吋，普通梁板式楼盖较为经 济;对于无梁楼盖，降低板厚能有效降低成本，主要受钢筋价格大幅降低的影响; 从单位平米的造价看，跨度为6mX6m的无梁楼盖成本最低。 关键词： 地下工程;楼盖;板厚;柱距;造价; 作者简介：芮圣洁，博士研究生，Emai 1 : rui5658@foxmai 1. como 基金：国家自然科学基金资助项冃51379194) Economic and technical analysis in the form of different floors in underground engineering structure Rui Shengjie Zhou Wenjie College of Civil Engineering and Architecture of Zhejiang University; Abstract： Floors of different types have significant influences to its cost especially with the steel price considerably reducing at present, so selecting the proper floor to cut down the cost proves very important. Two common floors ( nonbeam floor and bean-and~slab floor) were taken for example, and differe nt dis tern ces bet ween the columns ( 6 m X 6 m, 8 m X 8 m, 10 m X 10 m) on the condition were selected that the floor has 0. 5 meter soil and both 2. 5 k N/m2 dead and live load as well as take the cost of steel, concrete and soil excavation into consideration. Its found that: non-beam floor has 1ower cost when the distemce between columns is short while bcam-and-slab floor is more economic whon it has long distance between columns. As to non-beam floor, reducing the thickness of the floor can efficiently cut down the expense mainly due to the fall of st eel price. From the cos t per square meter, non-beam floor with 6 meter of the column distanee has the lowest cost. Keyword： underground engineering; floor; thickness of floor; column space; cost; 0引言 近些年来，随着社会经济和城市的发展，地下空间的开发与地下工程的建设已 成为新的热点［1-4］。地下工程结构设计过程屮，在保证结构安全的前提下如何 选择合理的楼盖结构形式，实现工程造价经济节约，已成为了工程设计过程中 的重要环节區虹。 目前，国内外在不同楼盖形式的经济性方面己进行了大量研究，相关学者通过 选用不同跨度、不同楼盖形式、不同荷载等进行分析探讨，以此选定较为经济的、 合理适用的楼盖结构形式。黄泰等IZ1通过比较六种楼盖得到了在跨度为6m和 9m情况下，得到了最经济的楼盖为单向肋梁+单向板的形式的结论;王晓丹固 通过对楼盖的计算，发现普通的钢筋混凝土楼盖中，单向板肋梁楼盖为最经济 的；李小健回通过计算分析各种楼盖总造价时发现:主梁+