新诊疗模式下城乡联合慢性心衰标准化治疗的管理效果探索.docxVIP

  • 5
  • 0
  • 约1.06万字
  • 约 10页
  • 2019-08-09 发布于广东
  • 举报

新诊疗模式下城乡联合慢性心衰标准化治疗的管理效果探索.docx

屮国现代医生201730(55),138-142 新诊疗模式下城乡联合慢性心衰标准化 治疗的管理效果探索 陈志云 何正飞 孙凌刚 杭州市富阳区第一人民医院心血管内科 导出/参考文献关注 分享 收藏打印 摘要: 目的分析新诊疗模式下城乡联合慢性心衰标准化治疗的管理效果。方法选取医 院2014年6月2016年6月收治的慢性心力衰竭患者80例作为研究对彖,根据 随机数字表法分为两组:患者出院之后,对照组40例给予常规门诊随访,干预 组40例使用慢性心衰专用病历,结合计算机数据管理平台,与社区卫生服务中 心形成资源共享,联合进行随访管理。随访12个月后,比较两组患者标准化药 物使用率、6 min步行距离(6MWT)、再次住院率、心功能改善效果、心血管事 件、生存质量。结果随访12个月后,干预组LVEF明显高于对照组,血清NT-Pro BNP水平明显低于对照组(P0. 05);干预组6MWT明显高于对照组,情绪评分、 躯体评分及MLHFQ总分均明显低于对照组(P0.05);干预组B受体阻滞剂、 ACEI/ARB使用率均明显高于对照组(P0.05);干预组MACE发牛率、再住院率 及住院时间均明显低于对照组(P0. 05)。结论 新诊疗模式下城乡联合慢性心 衰标准化治疗管理模式提高了慢性心力衰竭患者标准化药物使用率、6MWT,改善 了生存质量及心功能,降低了再次住院率,为一种有效可行的慢性心力衰竭管 理方式。 关键词: 慢性心力衰竭;城乡联合慢性心衰标准化治疗;管理效果;分析; 收稿日期:2017-08-04 基金:浙江省杭州市科技局医疗卫生及重点专科专病科研攻关项目 61) Investiga/tion on the management effect of standardized treatment of urban and rural combined chronic heart failure under the new treatment and diagnosis mode CHEN Zhiyun HE Zhengfei SUN Linggang Department of Vasculocardiology, Fuyang Distriet First Peoples Hospital of Hangzhou City; Abstract: Objective To analyze the management effect of standardized trcatment of urban and rural combined chronic heart failure under new treatment and diagnosis mode. Methods A total of 80 patients with chronic heart failure from June 2014 to June 2016 who were admitted to hospital were selected as the study subjects. According to the random rmmber table method, the patients were divided into two groups: after the patients were discharged, 40 patients in the control group were given routine outpatient follow-up, and 40 patients in the intervention group were given special medical record of chronic heart failure, combined with computer data management platform, the resource sharing was formed with communi ty heal th service center, joint follow-up management was performed. After 12 months of followup, the standardized drug use rate, 6-minute walking distance ( 6 MWT) , re-hospitalization rate, cardiac function improvement effect, cardiovascular events, and quality of life were compared between

文档评论(0)

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档