青少年依恋风格的相关研究.PPT

Construction of scales Secure (13 items) α=.854 Anxious/Ambivalent (11 items) α=.781 Avoidant (8 items) α=.751 Total Friendship Attachment (30 items) α=.882 Construction of scales Construct validity The convergent and discriminantvalidity of the AFAS scales Gender and age differences 2(13 to 15years, 16 to 19 years)×2(Female, Male) ANOVAs 年龄无显著差异 性别有差异 女孩在安全感上的得分较高 F(1, 486) =27.84, p .001, η2 = .056 AFAS总分也高于男孩 F(1, 486) =25.50, p .001, η2 = .052 在回避维度上低于男生 F(1, 486) = 38.21, p .001, η2 = .075 研究二 a second study was undertaken using an independently sampled group of adolescence in order to replicate the hierarchical second-order factor structure for the AFAS reported in Study one. 研究二使用了独立样本，复制了研究一 Results The AFAS is internally consistent and stable over time and displayed appropriate convergent and discriminant validity with regards to attachment style classification and specific measures of parental and peer attachment. AFAS内部一致性较高，也较为稳定。有良好的聚合效度和区分效度 As predicted the AFAS, as a measure of best friend relationship quality, was moderately to highly related to a measure of clique relationship quality, the IPPA Peer scale. AFAS与IPPA同伴量表呈中等高相关 The AFAS was relatively unrelated to the IPPA Parent scale, a measure of adolescent parental attachment quality. AFAS与IPPA Parent scale相对不相关 Future research should also seek to examine the utility of the AFAS in assessing the impact of the pattern of adolescent relationships on psychological health and adjustment during this important period of interpersonal transition. 未来的研究应设法检验AFAS的实际效用，即在青少年期这个重要的过渡时期，AFAS是否能够准确评估青少年关系模式对其心理健康和适应的影响 Best friend attachment versus peer attachment in the prediction of adolescent psychological adjustment（2010） Journal of Adolescence（Impact Factor: 1.638） 好友依恋关系与同伴依恋关系对青春期心理适应的不同预测作用 报告人：徐伊文婕 abstract This study examined the utility of the newly developed Adolescent Friendship Attachment Scale (AFAS) for the prediction of adolescent psychological health and school attitude