庭审中心主义视角下的行政审判流程再造.docxVIP

庭审中心主义视角下的行政审判流程再造 Reconstruction of Administrative Trial Process under the Perspectiveof Court Trial Centralism 作者： 李季红 作者简介： 李季红，中国政法大学2016级应用型法学博士研究生。 原文出处： 《政法论坛》（京）2018年第20181期 第176-184页 内容提要： 在行政诉讼中实行庭审中心主义对于推进以审判为中心的 诉讼制度改革、发挥行政审判职能作用、完善行政审判特 色制度具有重要意义。落实庭审中心主义可以从优化行政 审判程序、完善行政审判流程的角度切入，依靠程序的正 当性促进司法公正和司法公信，依靠程序的自治性隔断外 部不当干预，依靠程序的制约性防止法官偏私偏信，依靠 程序的参与性保障直接言词原则的落实。当前行政审判流 程述存在衔接不紧、主体不分、久拖不决等问题，严重制 约了庭审中心主义的落实。对此，应当以排除行政权力干 扰、保持行政审判独立性、提升司法公信力为目标导向， 对行政审判流程进行科学再造，通过设立独立的庭前准备 人员和职能，突出庭前准备对于庭审的基础保障作用，通 过实行即时分案、即时开庭、即时合议、当庭宣判，实现 以庭审环节为中心的无缝化、集中化审理。 The implementation of court trial centelism in the administrativc litigation has important significance to promote the reform of the trialcentered procedure system, play the functions of administrative trial,and improve the characteristic system of administrative trial.To carry out the court trial centralism from an angle of optimizing administrative trial procedure,and perfecting the administrative trial process, relying on the promoting judicial justice and judicial credibility which depends on the legitimacy of trial procedure, the separation of improper intervention which depends on the procedural autonomy, preventing judges partiality which depends on the procedural conditionality, implementing the directness principle and the verbalism principle which depends on the procedural participation. The current administrative judicial process still has the problems of incongruous coherence,subject confusion, and delay decision, which seriously restrict the implementation of the court trial centralism. We should eliminate administrativc power interference, maintain the independence of administrativc judicial,and improve the judicial credibility as the goal orientation, and make scientific redesign of administrative trial process.We should establish independent pretrial preparation function and staff, highlight the basis role of pretrial preparation, and realize the seamless and centralized trial based on the courtcenter