外固定支架复位结合克氏针对桡骨远端骨折腕关节功能恢复.docVIP

外固定支架复位结合克氏针对桡骨远端骨折腕关节功能恢复.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
?河南省科技厅一般资助项目(20139087345) 外固定支架复位结合克氏针对桡骨远端骨折腕关节功能恢复的影响 付立策 ? 河南省军区直属医院创伤骨科显微外科?, 河南郑州? ??450003??????????????????? 【摘要】目的 探讨外固定支架与克氏针联合用于桡骨远端骨折对患者腕关节功能的影响。方法 2012年8月-2015年7月期间132例桡骨远端骨折患者以数字表法随机分为观察组与对照组,每组66例,观察组给予外固定支架结合克氏针治疗,对照组给予手法复位小夹板固定治疗,对比两组患者临床表现、腕关节功能恢复情况。结果 两组患者治疗前掌倾角、尺偏角比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05),治疗后两组掌倾角、尺偏角均显著增加,与治疗前比较差异具有统计学意义(P0.05),但治疗后两组掌倾角、尺偏角比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05);观察组患者手背消肿时间、疼痛环节时间以及骨折愈合时间均显著短于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01);观察组患者腕关节功能优良率为87.9%,明显高于对照组的69.7%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 外固定支架结合克氏针用于桡骨远端骨折的治疗,复位固定可靠,术后恢复快,腕关节功能恢复理想,值得推广。 【关键词】外固定支架;克氏针;桡骨远端骨折;腕关节功能 Influence on the recovery of Wrist function of external fixation combined with kirschner wires internal fixation in distal radius fractures Fu Lice, Department of orthopedics Affiliated Hospital of Henan province military trauma, Henan Zhengzhou 450003 【Abstract】Objective To discuss the clinical effects and the influence on the recovery of wrist function of external fixation combined with kirschner wires internal fixation in patients with distal radius fracture. Methods 132 patients with distal radius fracture during August 2012 to July 2015 were randomly divided into the observation group(n=66) and the control group(n=66), the observation group were treated with external fixation combined with kirschner wires, and the control group were treated with manipulative reduction and splint fixation, then the clinical manifestations and wrist function recovery condition were contrasted between the two groups. Results There was no significantly difference in the palmar tilt and ulnar deviation between the two groups before the treatment(P0.05), and significantly increased after the treatment(P0.05), but no significantly difference after the treatment between the two groups(P0.05); Swelling time of back of hand, pain relief time, fracture healing time in the observation group were significantly shorter than the control group(P<0.01); Excellent rate of the wrist function in the observation after the treatment was 87.9%, s

文档评论(0)

Lxq3610 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档