科普思维的再思考.pptVIP

科普思維的再思考 科學是不是一個信仰體系? 從匪貨到匪辭 科學報導到科普 科普法的國度 科普的宗教意識 科學月刊發刊辭 所以我們要辦一份科學月刊，不僅要作為學生們的良好課外讀物，也要成為一項有效的社教公器； 不但要普及科學，介紹新知，並且要啟發民智，培養科學的態度，為健全的理想社會奠定基礎。 1970年 科學有造於物質,有造於人生, 有造於知識,有助於間接提高 道德水準. 1915年“科學雜誌”創刊於上海之宗旨 台灣科學傳播的發展(雜誌) 科學月刊(1970,1 ) 牛頓雜誌(1983,52006) 科學眼 (1984,51990,4) 科技時代(2001,12005,12) 生技時代(2001,112005?) 科學人 (2002,3 ) 中國時報的發展 時報科學(1989--1997 ) 科普思維的再思考 科學是不是一個信仰體系? 從科學報導到科學評論 認識科學是一種文化創造活動的真實性而形成藝術評論般的科學評論 誰是科學家? 誰不是? 科學報導的雙難 科學知識本身的困境 異質文化的困障 一個新的嘗試 知識通訊評論的著眼 Sociologist fools physics judges Jim Giles Top of page Abstract But do social scientists understand science? After more than 30 years of studying the physicists who work on gravity waves, spending countless hours talking to physicists and writing a book on the history and sociology of the field, social scientist Harry Collins had a question. Could he pass as a physicist? He reckons he can —and he has the experimental data to prove it. Collinss study, to be published later this year, is the first experiment on the concept of interactional expertise, an idea that could influence areas such as peer review and science journalism. It could even help settle a question lingering since the science wars of the 1990s, when sociologists launched what scientists saw as attacks on the very nature of science, and scientists responded in kind. Collinss claim rests on his answers to a set of seven questions about gravity-wave physics set by a gravity-wave physicist. His replies, together with those from a real gravitational physicist, were sent to nine researchers in the field (see Faking it). Asked to spot the real physicist, seven were unsure and two chose Collins. The results appear in a paper co-authored with Rob Evans, like Collins based at Cardiff University, UK. It is due to be published this December in Studies in the History of Philosophy of Science (for a preprint see http://w