- 278
- 0
- 约4.51千字
- 约 2页
- 2020-01-14 发布于浙江
- 举报
反方二辩:
Thank you,Mr.(Ms.)speaker. Ladies and gentlemen, good evening!
In the first part of my speech, I would like to make my rebuttal.The prop seem to think theyre providing extra incentives to scientists from universities and research institutions, therefore increasing innovation. This is wrong. Firstly, many scientists work for pharmaceutical companies directly . Secondly, scientists at universities and research institutions are paid by pharmaceutical companies to undertake research for them. Why is this important? It means that scientists are actually harmed under the propositions model, no
原创力文档

文档评论(0)