竞业限制协议的效力认定研究——基于2013-2019年裁判文书的实证分析.pdfVIP

摘要 用人单位为了保护自身的商业秘密等合法权益，往往与劳动者签订竞业限制 协议。随着该协议在实践中的应用愈发广泛，司法裁判中的竞业限制纠纷也日渐 增多。竞业限制协议的效力认定是解决竞业限制纠纷的先决性问题，但是由于我 国相关立法缺位，各级各地法院在司法裁判中对协议的效力认定不尽相同，缺乏 统一的适用规则，导致司法裁判中“同案不同判”的现象频繁发生。 本文正文共分为四部分： 第一部分为引言部分，介绍了本文研究意义与目的、文献综述、研究方法和 创新与不足之处，为本文研究提供基础条件。 第二部分为本文的创新部分，笔者梳理分析2013-2019 年竞业限制协议效力 的相关案件，提炼出此类案件的争议焦点，并从竞业限制协议的保护客体、对象、 领域、地域、期限以及补偿金条款对协议效力认定的裁判规则进行具体深入的分 析与评价。 第三部分为域外考察，梳理分析域外关于合理审查原则、公共利益保护原则 的效力认定原则和关于各个要素判断标准的具体规则的经验，并对上述经验进行 总结，得出引入合理审查原则、明确认定标准和补偿金效力规定的启示。 第四部分为法律建议，针对司法裁判中的现存问题，结合域外先进经验的启 示，提出司法适用的完善经验。首先，明确司法裁判过程中应当秉承的原则，包 括合理审查原则、契约自由原则和利益平衡原则。其次，明确各要素对协议的效 力影响，区分必备性要素和参考性要素。最后，明确合理性审查的动态标准和考 量因素，从而有效的指导具体竞业限制协议效力认定的司法裁判活动。 关键词：竞业限制协议，效力认定，经济补偿金 I Abstract In order to protect their legitimate rights and interests such as business secrets, employers often sign non-competition agreements with labors. As the agreement has become more widely used in practice, disputes over competition restrictions in judicial decisions have also increased. The determination of the effectiveness of the non- competition agreement is a prerequisite for resolving disputes over competition restrictions. However, due to the absence of relevant legislation in our country, the courts have different judgments on the validity of the agreement in judicial decisions, and the lack of uniform applicable rules has led to the phenomenon of different judgments in the same case frequently occurs in judicial decisions. This thesis consists of four chapters. The first chapter is the introduction. It introduces the significance and purpose of the thesis, literature review, research methods, innovations and shortcomings. In order to provide the basic conditions for the research. The second chapter is the innovative part of this thesis. By c