我囯环境民事公益诉讼费用制度探究——以环保民间组织为视角.pdfVIP

摘 要 环境民事公益诉讼制度的确立对于生态环境保护有着极其重要的作用，但是 从近年来环境民事公益诉讼司法实践来看，其效果不理想。究其原因，主要是由 于高额的案件受理费、鉴定费以及其他费用阻碍了我国环境民事公益诉讼的发展。 虽然最高人民法院、各地政府以及各类基金组织先后制定如缓、减、免诉讼费等 司法救助机制、建立环境民事公益诉讼专项基金等相关制度，进一步减轻、缓解 民间环保组织在民事公益诉讼中的经济压力，但部分制度在操作以及效果方面仍 有许多不足和缺陷。 上述制度并没有解决环保民间组织在民事公益诉讼中经济困难的根源问题， 即现行环境民事公益诉讼案件受理费收费规则成本过高、其他诉讼费用规定转移 规则不明确性致使民间组织经济负担过重，差异化收费规则以及缺乏原告胜诉激 励机制极大降低民间组织参与到公益诉讼中的积极性。这种经济和心理双重压力 使得大量环保民间组织不愿意甚至没有能力积极参与到环境民事公益诉讼。 因此，需要重新构建环境民事公益诉讼费用制度规则。笔者认为，应当在重 构现行诉讼费用规则的基础上，进一步完善环境民事公益诉讼专项基金，而后通 过建立多元化环境保险制度，衔接申请诉讼费缓、减、免或政府相关费用补助措 施以及加强多政府部门司法救助联动，并配套建立原告胜诉奖励机制作为动力， 共同构成环境民事公益诉讼费用的最佳途径，保障环境民事公益诉讼发挥其最大 功效。 关键词：环境民事公益诉讼 环保民间组织 诉讼费用 费用规则 I Abstract The establishment of environmental civil public interest litigation system plays an extremely important role in ecological environment protection,But the effect is not satisfactory from the recent environmental civil public interest litigation judicial practice.The main reason is that the high cost of case acceptance, appraisal and other expenses hinder the development of environmental civil public interest litigation in China.Although the Supreme Peoples Court, local governments and all kinds of fund organizations have successively formulated relevant systems such asjudicial assistance mechanisms such as the remission of legal fees and the establishment of special funds for environmental civil public interest litigation to further alleviate and alleviate the economic pressure of civil environmental protection organizations in civil public interest litigation, some systems still have many shortcomings and shortcomings in operation andeffect. The above system does not address the root causes of the economic difficulties of civil environmentalprotection organizations in civilpublic interest litigation,That is,the cost ofthecurrent environmental civilpublic interest litigatio