Defining Motions Constructing Cases-Guidelines f数字1时代的商务英语写作or Competitors and Adjudicators by Andrew Stockley.pdf

Defining Motions Constructing Cases-Guidelines f数字1时代的商务英语写作or Competitors and Adjudicators by Andrew Stockley.pdf

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Defining Motions Constructing Cases: Guidelines for Competitors and Adjudicators by Andrew Stockley (New Zealand) For a debate to proceed, both teams need a clear understanding of what the motion means. This requires the motion to be ‘defined’ so that everyone (audience and adjudicators included) knows what is being debated. Problems arise if the two teams present different understandings of the meaning of the motion. This can result in a ‘definition debate’, where the focus of the debate becomes the meaning of the words in the motion, rather than the motion itself. Interaction and clash between the two teams concentrates on whose definition is correct, rather than the issues raised by the motion. Definition debates should be avoided wherever possible. They make a mockery of what debating seeks to achieve. 1. REASONABLE DEFINITIONS The Proposition must present a reasonable definition of the motion. This means: (a) On receiving a motion, both teams should ask: ‘What is the issue that the two teams are expected to debate? What would an ordinary intelligent person reading the motion think that it is about?’ (b) If the motion poses a clear issue for debate (i.e. it has an obvious meaning), the Proposition must define the motion accordingly. When the motion has an obvious meaning (one which the ordinary intelligent person would realise), any other definition would not be reasonable. (c) If there is no obvious meaning to the motion, the range of possible meanings is limited to those that allow for a reasonable debate. Choosing a meaning that does not allow the Opposition room for debate would not be a reasonable definition. Truisms and tautologies leave the Opposition no room for debate and are clearly illegitimate. Defining absolute words literally may prevent a reasonable debate, and they can therefore be read down. (d) When defining the words in the motion so as (i) to allow the obvious meaning to be debated or (ii) (when there

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

恬淡虚无 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

学高为师,身正为范.师者,传道授业解惑也。做一个有理想,有道德,有思想,有文化,有信念的人。 学无止境:活到老,学到老!有缘学习更多关注桃报:奉献教育,点店铺。

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档