公安机关视角下丁某等人制造销售假奖券案的罪与罚.pdfVIP

摘 要 公安机关作为执法机关具有双重属性身份，在现有的法律框架下，公 安机关一方面有行政执法权力，另一方面法律又授予其刑事执法职能，公 安机关在行政执法与刑事司法的衔接过程中包括实体衔接、程序衔接。从 公安机关视角分析丁某等人制作销售假奖券案件争议点，从实体衔接和程 序衔接两个角度分析司法实践出现的分歧点，实体衔接是指对行政违法行 为是否涉嫌犯罪的判断，以及当涉嫌犯罪的行政违法行为既要追究行政责 任又要追究刑事责任时，如何对行政处罚与刑事处罚进行衔接。程序衔接 是指刑事司法转行政处罚过程中，公安机关如何转移成行政案件进行行政 处罚。公安机关在对案件定性时由于违法行为具有双重违法性存在定性困 难，在罪与非罪问题上不能明确作出判断，如果不能很好得衔接容易造成 以刑代罚或是以罚代刑，在行政法与刑法适用上是择一适用还是并罚，程 序衔接上，当公安机关面对检察院酌情不予起诉的是否需要继续对其行政 处罚，公安机关作为行政执法独立执法主体，不应当以检察院下达的检察 建议作为行政执法前提。 关键词：行政执法；刑事司法；衔接；公安机关 II 硕士学位论文 Abstract As a law enforcement organ, the public security organ has dual attributes. Under the existing legal framework, on one hand, the public security organ has the power of administrative law enforcement on , on the other hand, the law grants it the function of criminal law enforcement. From the perspective of public security organs, this paper analyses the disputes in the case of Ding Mous making and selling false lottery tickets, and the differences in judicial practice from the perspectives of entity cohesion and procedure cohesion. Entity convergence refers to whether administrative violations are suspected of crimes. And how to link the administrative punishment with the criminal punishment when the administrative illegal act suspected of committing the crime should be investigated both for administrative responsibility and criminal responsibility. The public security organs have difficulties in characterizing cases because of the double illegality of illegal acts, and they can not clearly make judgments on the issue of crime and non-crime.when the public security organs face the prosecutors offices discretion not to prosecute whether they need to continue to impose administrative penalties, the public security organs are independent law enforcement subjects. The procuratoria