如何写好-response-to-reviewer——发表sci文章实战.pdfVIP

如何写好 Response to review——发表 SCI 文章实战 发表文章有不少步骤，走走停停，有时候会因为得到审稿人的赏识和认可开心不 已，当然也会因为意见尖锐，无法修改而苦恼不已，下面我总结了一些例子，看 看如何回答 review report 里面的问题，所有内容均是自己文章投稿的真实过程， 希望对大家有所帮助。 1. 关于 Cover letter 整理了一份一般的格式，大体都是这样，呵呵 Dear Editor Dr. Yinon Rudich Nov. 25, 2009 JGR Manuscript Number: 2009JD013023, “Gross primary production estimation from MODIS data with vegetation index and photosynthetically absorbed radiation in maize” Enclosed is the revised version of the paper entitled “Remote estimation of gross primary production in maize, coniferous forest and grassland using MODIS images”. We appreciated the thorough reviews provide by the journal and the positive response of both two reviewers that found the research of this manuscript is suitable for JGR. Below is our response to their comments resulting in a number of clarifications. Regards Dr. Chaoyang Wu 2. 关于 Response 细节 最根本的一个要求是事实就是，有什么说什么，不要企图遮遮掩掩，也 不要回避，对意见一般先要礼节性的感谢或者同意，然后再做出修改。格式一般 要求对不同的审稿人的意见作出一一回答，一定要细致，千万不要以为能够蒙混 过关，自己把不能解决的问题删掉，这样的回复估计就要被拒掉了。还是老老实 实的回答，即使暂时不能回答的，如一些方法改进之类的，委婉的说一下，如今 后的实验会注意等等。 对于粗心的错误，自己就痛快承认了，没什么大不了的。 哈哈，坦诚一点，给人的印象好一点。 下面是一个列子，希望能对大家有所帮助。 Manuscript Number: 2009JD013023 Manuscript Title: Gross primary production estimation from MODIS data with vegetation index and photosynthetically absorbed radiation in maize Associate Editor (Remarks to Author): Three reviewers provide reasonably consistent views about your manuscript, although their choices of the category differ. I believe that the paper is worthy of publication in JGR as the correlations between GPP and VIs are significant and could be useful for arid region crop growth estimation. However, these empirical relationships would have limitations, and these limitations are not clearly stated. In areas where radiation is variable, GPP may depend on not only vegetation greenness but al