- 1、本文档共276页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
A group of startup companies’ offer dedicated 802.11 security devices to enterprises building wireless LAN networks. Based on a conservative analysis, these security solution vendors will have an addressable market of $500 million by 2006. The vendors compete against VPNs and new Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA) and 802.11i security systems. Vendors include Bluesocket Inc., Cranite Systems Inc., Fortress Technologies Inc., ReefEdge Inc., and Vernier Networks Inc. Typically the security solution offered by these vendors consist of servers or gateways that sit behind a number of access points to aggregate traffic and apply security policies and network permissions. But each vendor has a slightly different take on how best to do this. Fortress Technology and Cranite Systems, for example, both use Layer 2 encryption; while Bluesocket, ReefEdge, and Vernier operate at Layer 3. From a security point of view, the relative merits of Layer 2 and Layer 3 are moot, although Cranite Systems claims it is the first to implement the new Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) that is mandated for the transmission of sensitive, non-military U.S. government data. These vendors however do not see security as their core long-term value proposition and therefore are not concerned about the emergence of the WPA and 802.11i security standards based on the 802.1x authentication protocol. “At the link-layer it’s right to have standard security mechanisms, and it’s to our benefit that standards are taking over encryption,” Evan Sohn, vice president for marketing at ReefEdge, told the Wireless Oracle. Instead, these vendors are talking up their wireless network management capabilities such as class-of-service bandwidth allocation, granular access permissions, and enabling users to roam among access points without losing their connections -- all of which, they claim, gives them significant advantages over any other solutions. “VPNs do have a lot of security and control mechanisms,” explains
文档评论(0)