- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
第 2 篇作文:
Writing (30 minutes)
Directions:For this part,you are allowed 30minutesto write a short essay entitled Students’Evaluation of Their Teachers followingthe outline given below.You should write at least 120 words but no more than 180 words. 1.学生对教师的评估被越来越广泛地应用。
人们对其持不同态度
你的看法
Students’Evaluationof Their Teachers
A great change is now taking place in higher education throughout our country.
Teachers are being held responsible as never before for how well they serve their students. It has become as common in colleges and universities for students to grade teachers as for teachers to grade students. In some universities students’ rating has even become the only source of information on teaching effectiveness.
This, however, has caused great controversy. Some are in favor of the rating system. They hold that since students attend the teachers classes everyday, they should have their opinion about their teachers’ effectiveness. Others, on the contrary, are strongly against it. They think that students’ rating is easy to administer and score, but it also is easy to abuse. They believe that there is much more to teaching than what is shown on students’ rating forms. Students should not be expected to judge whether the materials used are up to date or how well the teacher knows about the subject.
These judgments require professional knowledge, which is best left for the
teachers’ colleagues.
I think students’ rating of their teachers is necessary, but it should be conducted
in a way that can really shed meaningful light on teachers’ performance. Instead of
rating the teachers’ knowledge on the subject, students should be asked to estimate what they themselves have leaned in a course, and to report on such things as a teacher’s ability to communicate with students, his relationship with students, and his ability to arouse interest in the subject.
您可能关注的文档
- 大课间跑操评分表.docx
- 大口径钢制管桥施工方案.docx
- 大跨度梁模板支设方案.docx
- 大跨度悬索桥的发展历史与研究.docx
- 大跨径浅埋隧道108长管棚施工工法.docx
- 大跨径自锚悬索桥施工工艺研究 pdfhttp.docx
- 大理古城导游词范文3篇.docx
- 大连电大机房管理制度.docx
- 大连理工版本化工设备机械基础作业答案.docx
- 大连市房地产开发项目报批报建费用明细表.docx
- 2026届江苏省泰州市高港区许庄中学九年级化学第一学期期中达标检测模拟试题含解析.doc
- 2026届吉林省白山市九年级化学第一学期期中调研模拟试题含解析.doc
- 江苏省部分学校2025-2026学年高三上学期8月联考英语试题(原卷版).docx
- 2026届陕西省陕西师范大附属中学九年级化学第一学期期中质量检测模拟试题含解析.doc
- 2026届福建省莆田市荔城区擢英中学九上化学期中学业质量监测模拟试题含解析.doc
- 15.4 焦耳定律 课件(共28页PPT)2025-2026学年沪粤版九年级上册.pptx
- 2025年公务员面试常见误区解析与真题解析卷.docx
- 重庆市江津第二中学校联盟2025-2026学年九年级上学期期中考试语文试题.pdf
- 江苏省徐州市2025-2026学年上学期第一次质量检测九年级数学试题(无答案).pdf
- 重庆市梁山初中教育集团2025-2026学年八年级上学期期中考试数学试题(含部分答案).pdf
原创力文档


文档评论(0)