几个强度理论的屈服实验研究.docVIP

  几个强度理论的屈服实验研究 牛杰1,2，田杰1,2，张雅琼1,2，刘光连2，孟力平3** （1. 高性能复杂制造国家重点实验室，长沙 410083； 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 2. 中南大学机电工程学院，长沙 410083； 3. 中南大学材料科学与工程学院，长沙 410083） 摘要：本文根据多种类塑性金属的二向和三向拉伸与压缩组合主应力屈服强度实验数据，对 Tresca 强度理论、Mises 强度理论、Coulomb-Mohr 强度理论、Beltrami 最大能量理论、极限 应变能强度理论等几个强度理论计算的相对误差进行了比较分析，得到极限应变能强度理论 计算的相对误差在 10%以下为最小与实验结果相符，Tresca 强度理论、Mises 强度理论、 Coulomb-Mohr 强度理论计算的相对误差有时分别达-36%、-27%、-23%，计算结果比试验结 果较偏安全。拉伸屈服强度和压缩屈服强度相等材料的剪切屈服强度为拉伸屈服强度的 0.707 倍。极限应变能强度理论能进行二向和三向拉伸与压缩组合主应力强度计算，在全拉 伸和全压缩主应力状态下与 Rankine 强度理论一致，具有工程应用前景和价值。 关键词：塑性金属；屈服；强度实验；强度理论；极限应变能强度理论 中图分类号：TH114 YIELD EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON SEVERAL STRENGTH THEORIES NIU Jie1,2, TIAN Jie1,2, ZHANG Yaqiong1,2, LIU Guanglian2, MENG Liping3 (1. State Key Laboratory of High Performance Complex Manufacturing, ChangSha 410083; 2. School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Central South University, ChangSha 410083; 3. School of Material Science and Engineering, Central South University, ChangSha 410083) Abstract: In this paper, based on the yield strength experiment data of various types of plastic metals under biaxial and triaxial tensile-compressive combined principal stress, the relative error calculated by Tresca strength theory, Mises strength theory, Coulomb-Mohr strength theory, Beltramis maximum energy theory and limiting strain energy strength theory (LSEST) etc. is compared and analyzed. According to LSEST, it is obtained that the relative errors that less than 10% are the minimum, which is consistent with the test result, while the relative errors calculated by Tresca strength theory, Mises strength theory, Coulomb-Mohr strength theory amount to -36%, -27%, -23% respectively in some situation, which are on safe side compared with the test results. For materials with equal tensile and compressive yield strength, the shear yield strength is 0.707 times of the tensile yield strength. Furthermore, LSEST can be used to calculate the strength under biaxial and triaxial tensile-compressive combined principal st