- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
外文翻译
原文
Multicriteria Evaluation and Local Environmental Planning for Sustainable Tourism
Material Source: Advances in Modern Tourism Research,2007(2) Author:Andrea De Montis,Giancarlo Deplano and Peter Nijkamp
Absrtact:This paper points out how evaluation might become a useful tool to develop suitable policies for integrated sustainable development. This concept is quite complex and requires analysis able to cope with con?icting multiple objectives. Notwithstanding these assumptions, the Regime method combined with the AHP approach has proved in this application to be a useful multicriteria procedure, since it yields very good and easy to handle results.
In a more general perspective, this paper sheds some light on the broad basis of decision-making processes.
One of the main ?ndings is that the application of the Regime method framework has allowed the analyst to use both cardinal and ordinal criteria within the system of individual preference structure, mathematically described by means of the outranking analysis. In this case, there seems to be enough evidence to con?rm that the outranking structure embedded in the Regime framework is able to cope much better with the complexity and uncertainty, which is often present in environmental tourist policies, than other multicriteria frameworks.
Nevertheless, the analysis of the results considered in this exercise demonstrates how subjective the advice for the ?nal choice might become, especially when different stakeholders are involved at the same time in the same decisional arena. In this case, the degree of uncertainty of the system has been limited by ?xing the list of criteria and by allowing variability only to the weight vector. However, the volatility of the ?nal ranking may increase, if subjectivity is also allowed to creep in for the construction of the criteria system. In this case, the whole system of criteria and weights should be tuned every time according to each different
文档评论(0)