- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
曼德维尔对卢梭自然状态学说的影响
[作者简介]1.苏光恩,男,浙江大学公共管理学院博士研究生,主要从事西方政治思想史研究;2.高力克,男,浙江大学传媒与国际文化学院教授,博士生导师,主要从事近现代思想史研究。
[摘 要] 曼德维尔是早期现代社会的重要辩护者,他关于社会起源的论说对卢梭的《论人与人之间不平等的起因和基础》构成了深远的影响,后者的野蛮人形象、文明的演进论以及对文明实质的判断都得益于曼德维尔。是曼德维尔真正将自然法从自然状态中驱逐,使这一学说的主旨由统治的正当性变成了文明社会的历史。但曼德维尔与卢梭在人性论上的分歧使他们对文明的态度截然对立:曼德维尔所展示的社会形成过程实质上是人之粗鄙野蛮的激情如何得到驯服的过程,现代文明正体现了这种高超的驯化人性的技艺;而在卢梭看来文明恰恰是套在人身上的沉重枷锁,既剥夺了其原初的自由,亦扭曲了其纯真的天性。曼德维尔那里所隐含的文明的进步观在卢梭这里变成了人类的堕落史。?
[关键词] 曼德维尔; 卢梭; 自然状态; 文明社会; 激情
??
Mandeville?s Influence on Rousseau?s Doctrine of the State of Nature?
?Su Guang?en Gao Like?(1.College of Public Administration, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; ?
2.College of Media and International Culture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, China)
Abstract: Bernard Mandeville was one of the most controversial figures in the early 18th century, and his doctrine of the state of nature was also the most important source of Rousseau?s ?Discourse on Inequality. ?Adam Smith noted this a long time ago, but it has not got enough attention for a long time. Clarifying the connection between Mandeville and Rousseau?s doctrines of the state of nature is very important, not only for grasping the essence of Rousseau?s thought, but also for the appreciation of civil society in the 18th century.?
The 2nd volume of ?The Fable of the Bees? was a mature answer to the question that how could human being as ″an extraordinary selfish and headstrong, as well as cunning animal″ be the only sociable animal, which Mandeville had concerned with for years. Same with modern natural law tradition, Mandeville resorted to a state of nature to contemplate the origins of society, but what he concerned with was the history of civil society, rather than justification of ruling, and he provided with a completely historical dimension. In his state of nature, there was no so?called natural law, and the barbarism and ignorance of man in the state of nature also made it impossible for them to establish society by cont
文档评论(0)