不安抗辩权与预期违约制度比较及其对我国_合同法_相关条款之影响.pdfVIP

20 10 7 山东省青年管理干部学院学报 Ju,l 2010 4( 146) Journal of Shandong Youth Adm in istrati e C adres C ollege No. 4 Ju.l No. 146 于学明 ( , 250014) : 不安抗辩权是大陆法系中有关合同履行的抗辩权制度, 预期违约制度是英美法系合同中有关先期违约制度, 通过对不安抗辩权和预期违约制度的 释, 采用比较的方法, 对我国合同法 中引进不安抗辩权制度和预期违约制度 进行讨论在此基础上对合同法 中相关条款的完善提出相应的建议 : 不安抗辩权; 预期违约; 明示违约; 默示违约 : D923. 6 : A : 1008- 7605( 2010) 04- 0095- 04 A bstrac t: The Precarious R ight to Defense is the defense sy stem about contract performance in the Con tinentalLaw System, wh ile the Anticipatory Breach system is about the anticipatory regu lations in theAnglo- Am erican Law System. Bym eans of the classification of the Precarious R ight to Defense and theAnticipatory Breach System, th is article states the conflictions between the A rticle 68, 69, wh ich introduces the Precarious R ight to Defense, and theA rticle 94, 108, w hich introduces theAnticipatory Breach of Contract com parati ely, and m akes the correspond ing suggestions to perfect the system in the Contract Law. k ey w ord s: precarious right to defense; anticipatory breach of con tract; repudiation; dmi in ished expectation ∀[ 2] , , , , , , , , , , : () , , : ! , ; () , , ; ( ) , , ∀ , : ! , , , , , , ∀[ 1]