【精品】哈佛公开课Justice第一课字幕中英对照精解.pdfVIP

Jusstice: What’ss the Right TThing to Do? Episode OnOne episode [epiisəud] n. 插曲曲, 一段情节, 片片段, 轶事 PART ONEE: THE MORAL SSIDE OF MURDEER 谋杀的道德侧侧面 moral [mɔrəəl] adj. 道德的的 If you haad to choose bbetween (1) kiilling one perrson to save tthe lives of hypothetical [haipəuθetikəl]] adj.假设的,假假定的,爱猜想的 five others and (2) doing nothing even though yyou knew that five people scenario [sinaa:riəu] n. 情节节梗概, 剧本 would die right beforre your eyes if you did notthing—what woould you do? reasoning [ri:zniŋ] n. 推论论, 推理, 论证 What would be the right thing to do? That’s tthe hypotheticcal scenario vote [vəut] nn. 投票, 选举 vv. 投票, 选举, 表决 Professor Michael Sanndel uses to llaunch his course on morall reasoning. conundrum [kkənʌndrəm] nn. 谜语, 难题 After thee majority of students votees for killingg the one persson in order artfully [a:tfulli] adv.艺术地,有有技巧地,熟练地地,狡诈地 to save the lives of five others, Sandel presents three simmilar moral defend [difend] v. 防护, 辩辩护, 防守 conundrums—each one artfully desiigned to make the decisionn more conflict [kɔnfllikt] n.冲突,矛矛盾 vi. 冲突,争争执 difficult. As studennts stand up too defend theirr conflicting choices, it conflicting [kəənfliktiŋ] adj . 相冲突的 becomes clear that thhe assumptionss behind our mmoral reasoninng are often defend [difend] v. 防护, 辩护护, 防守 contradictory, and the question of what is rightt and what is wwrong is not assumption [əəsʌmpʃən] n.假假定,设想,担任(职职责等),假装 always black and whitte. co