论口供补强规则-毕业论文.doc

ABSTRACT 论口供补强规则 摘 要 口供补强规则是一项防止误判的重要规则，然而，我国《刑事诉 讼法》中却仅有第 46 条笼统的规定，该条文并没有明确规定什么样的 口供需要补强、补强证据需要符合什么样的条件、需要补强到何种程 度以及共犯的口供如何补强等问题，因而，仅有第 46 条的规定并不足 以防止产生误判。本文用比较研究的方法，具体界定了口供以及口供 补强规则的概念，讨论了口供补强规则与自由心证原则的关系，澄清 了口供补强规则的理论依据，并具体探讨了补强的对象、范围、程度 以及共犯的口供如何补强等问题。本文认为：只有承认全部或主要犯 罪事实的陈述才能构成口供，仅承认一部分犯罪事实的陈述属于自认 而不属于口供因而不需要补强；口供的内容仅有供述，不包括辩解； 口供补强规则仅指单凭口供即可形成有罪心证时必须有补强证据的要 求，口供不足以使法官形成有罪心证因而需要提供其他证据这是自由 心证原则的应有之义，不属于口供补强规则的范畴；口供补强规则是 自由心证原则的例外；口供补强规则的理论基础是防止误判而不是防 止强迫逼取口供；在我国，无论是庭上的口供还是庭外的口供，都需 要有补强证据予以补强；补强证据的补强程度只需达到它与口供相结 合能够证明犯罪事实的程度即可；共犯的口供被用于证明其他共犯的 罪行时应当有补强证据，但不能用各个共犯的口供相互作为对方的补 强证据。  关键词：口供  共犯口供  口供补强规则  自由心证原则  1 ABSTRACT ON THE CORROBORATION RULE ABSTRACT The corroboration rule is an important safeguard to prevent miscarriage of justice. Nevertheless, only one article（Article 46） which has something to do with this rule can be found in Chinese Criminal Procedure Law, and this only article does not deal with such problems as which kind of confession is required to be corroborated and how to corroborate the confession of the accomplice. Hence, it is not sufficient to depend only on this article to prevent errors in conviction. This dissertation defines “confession ” and “corroboration rule ” in a comparative perspective, and it examines some important issues such as the relationship between the corroboration rule and the free proof doctrine，the rationale of the corroboration rule and so on. The author’s main points are as follows: Ⅰ.If the accused only admits a little proportion of the offences , his statements can not be called “confession” but “admission”. Adimission is different from confession and it is not required to be corroborated. Ⅱ.The allegation of the accused is not included by “confession”. Ⅲ.The corroboration rule applies only on the occasion when the factfinder is convinced of the guilt on the sole ground of the confession. Ⅳ. The corroboration rule provides an exception of the free proof doctrine. Ⅴ.The corroboration rule is designed to preve