能谱成像技术去除金属伪影的临床价值.pdfVIP

2011 21 9 J Med Imaging Vol. 21 No. 9 2011 宁国庆, 黄召勤,袁先顺, 吕守臣, 刘庆伟 ( 250021) = :CT : 31 (Gemstone spect ral imaging, GSI) , ( 140kVp) , ( GSI View er) , 10keV 40 140keV 11 , , (Metal-Artifacts Reduction System, MARs) , ( 110keV + MARs ) ( ROI) SD , SD , 3210 ( 3 ; 2 , ; 1 , ; 0 , ) SPSS 17. 0 t : 110keV , 110keV MARs ( 110keV + MARs ) , SD ( P = 0. 000 0.05) , , : CT , CT , = CT; ; : R814.42 : A : 1006-9011(2011) 09- 1425-04 The value of energy spectral CT in reducing metal artifacts N I N G Guo-qing , H UA N G Zhao-qin, Y UA N X ian-shun , L V S hou-chen, L I U Qing-wei Dep a tment of Radiology , P ov incial H osp ital Af f iliated to S hand ong Unive s ity , J inan 250021, P. R. China = Abstract Obj ective: To evaluate t he pract ical value of energy spectral CT in reducing metal artifacts. Methods: 31 pa- tients w ith metal implants were scaned wit h GSI ( Gemstone spect ral imaging) examinat ion, and blend energy images were acquired at the same time, the spect rum analysis was used to select the monochromatic images at 110 keV and 110 keV+ MARs images, t he SD of ROI of blend energy images and energy spectral images w ere measured and the SD of artifacts were calculated, and all image quality w ere analyzed and scored into 3, 2, 1, 0 groups by three experienced radiologists in- dependent and blinded (3= w ithout artifact, 2= few artifacts, 1= some artifacts, 0= serious artifacts) . St atistical analysis was accomplished w ith SPSS 17.0 soft package. Results: T he results of score and all SD w ere recorded and analysised. There were significant statist ical differences betw een energy spectral images and blend energy images ( P 0.05) , that is to say, the image quality of energy spectral were significantly better than those of blend energy . Conclusio