CSE Annual Research Review and Executive Workshop 2002.ppt

CSE Annual Research Review and Executive Workshop 2002 AGILE Methods and CMMI Annual Research Review Executive Workshop Post Workshop Progress Report March 14, 2002 Participants Karen Owens, The Aerospace Corporation Josh Hurvitz, IAI Peter Hantos, Xerox Richard Turner, GWU Christine Davis, SEI Gary Thomas, SEI Cyrus Chow, NASA Apurva Jain, USC-CSE and others… Outline CMMI Practices vis-à-vis Agility Hypotheses Differences - Core Values - Characteristics - Approach - Focus - Challenges Similarities Potential Research Areas, the Road Ahead… Survey CMMI Practices vis-à-vis Agility “LEVEL 1” Identify scope of work Perform the work “LEVEL 2” Organizational policy for plan, perform Requirements, objectives and plans Adequate resources Assign responsibility and authority Train the people CM for designated work products Identify and involve stakeholders Monitor and control to plan and take action if needed Objectively monitor adherence to process and QA products/services Review with upper management and resolve issues KEY {GREEN : Supportive, BLACK: Neutral, RED: Rough Edges} CMMI Practices vis-à-vis Agility “LEVEL 3” Maintain as a defined process Measure the process performance to support environment “LEVEL 4” Establish and maintain quantitative objectives for the process Stabilize the performance of one or more sub-processes to determine its ability to achieve “LEVEL 5” Ensure continuous improvement to support business goals Identify and correct root causes of defects KEY {GREEN : Supportive, BLACK: Neutral, RED: Rough Edges} Hypotheses CMMI Toleration to Agile 8 Supportive, 6 Neutral, 4 Rough Edges : Over 18 Practices Supporting Appraisal in Agile Environment CMMI Level 5 Organization and Agility Agile Toleration to CMMI Are the doors Open? Differences “Core Values” Differences “Characteristics” Differences “Characteristics” Differences “Approach” Differences “Focus” “Challenge” Similarities Goal: High Performance Or