DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING.ppt

DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING Section 1.1 Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from known or assumed facts. When solving a problem, one must understand the question, gather all pertinent facts, analyze the problem i.e. compare with previous problems (note similarities and differences), perhaps use pictures or formulas to solve the problem. Deductive Reasoning Deductive Reasoning – A type of logic in which one goes from a general statement to a specific instance. The classic example All men are mortal. (major premise) Socrates is a man. (minor premise) Therefore, Socrates is mortal. (conclusion) The above is an example of a syllogism. Deductive Reasoning Syllogism: An argument composed of two statements or premises (the major and minor premises), followed by a conclusion. For any given set of premises, if the conclusion is guaranteed, the arguments is said to be valid. If the conclusion is not guaranteed (at least one instance in which the conclusion does not follow), the argument is said to be invalid. BE CARFEUL, DO NOT CONFUSE TRUTH WITH VALIDITY! Deductive Reasoning Examples: All students eat pizza. Claire is a student at ASU. Therefore, Claire eats pizza. 2. All athletes work out in the gym. Barry Bonds is an athlete. Therefore, Barry Bonds works out in the gym. Deductive Reasoning 3. All math teachers are over 7 feet tall. Mr. D. is a math teacher. Therefore, Mr. D is over 7 feet tall. The argument is valid, but is certainly not true. The above examples are of the form If p, then q. (major premise) x is p. (minor premise) Therefore, x is q. (conclusion) Venn Diagrams Venn Diagram: A diagram consisting of various overlapping figures contained in a rectangle called the universe. U This is an example of all A are B. (If A, then B.) B A Venn Diagrams This is an example of No A are B. U A B Venn D