海产品安全半数量风险评价.pdfVIP

International Journal of Food Microbiology 77 (2002) 55– 59 /locate/ijfoodmicro A semi-quantitative seafood safety risk assessment John Sumner *, Thomas Ross Centre for Food Safety and Quality, School of Agricultural Science, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252-54, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia Received 21 June 2001; received in revised form 13 November 2001; accepted 18 January 2002 Abstract As part of a semi-quantitative risk assessment of 10 seafood hazard/product combinations, a risk assessment tool was used to generate a Risk Ranking. The tool is in a spreadsheet software format and provides a risk estimate, which is scaled between 0 and 100, where 0 represents no risk and 100 represents all meals containing a lethal dose of the hazard. A full description of the tool is contained in Ross and Sumner (this issue). Based on their ranking, seafoods in Australia fell into three risk categories. Hazard/product pairs with ranking 32 included mercury poisoning (Relative Risk = 24), Clostridium botulinum in canned fish (RR = 25), or in vacuum-packed cold-smoked fish (RR = 28), parasites in sushi/sashimi (RR = 31), viruses in shellfish from uncontaminated waters (RR = 31), enteric bacteria in imported cooked shrimp (RR = 31) and algal biotoxins from controlled waters (RR = 31). It is noted that there have been no documented cases of food-borne illness from any of the above hazard/product pairings in Australia. Those with rankings 32–48 included Vibrio parahaemolyticus in cooked prawns (RR = 37), V. cholerae in cooked prawns (RR = 37), Listeria monocytogenes in cold-smoked seafoods (RR = 39), scombrotoxicosis (RR = 40),