_奥兹国的巫师_与_西游记_比较研究.pdfVIP

段风丽: 奥兹国的巫师与西游记比较研究 221 奥兹国的巫师 与西游记 比较研究 : 奥兹国的巫师(又译绿野仙踪)和西游记源自不同的文化土壤, 但是其影响力都 出 了各自的国界, 为世界各国的读者所喜爱本文旨在说明这两部童话作品的可比性, 并从叙事结构角 色分析意象构成等方面对两者进行详细的对比分析: 两者同为成长小说的叙事模式, 前者体现为 问 题儿童! 寻梦旅程! 心灵成熟∀的叙事结构, 后者则是 犯错儿童! 严酷考验! 成年命名∀的叙事模型; 两者中的主要角色都呈复合型; 前者依赖象征手法和矛盾修辞, 后者则是由词义叠加而构成此外, 本 文还从接受美学的角度来说明对这两部经典作品进行多重解读的可能性 : 可比性# 成长小说# 矛盾修辞# 拼贴# 接受美学 : 段风丽, 郧阳师范高等专科学校英语系讲师, 主要从事比较文学研究 T itle: A Comparative Study of the W izard of Oz andJourney to the W est Abs tract: The W izard of Oz and Journey to the W est w ere produced in different cultural soils. But their mi pacts have both surpassed the boundaries of their own nations. Th is paper focuses on the smi ilarities and differences betw een the wt o classic children∃ s read in s after an illustration of the feasib ility of comparin the seem in ly differentw orks, and ives a detailed comparison of the wt o w orks at aspects of narrative structure, construction of mi a es, etc. It ends w ith an illustration of reproducibility of the two works by emp loy in the theory of reception aesthetic. K ey w ord s: parallelism# b ildun srom an# oxymoron# colla e# reception aesthetics Au thor: Duan Fengli is a lecturer at the En lish Department, Yunyan Teachers∃ Colle e( Danjian kou 442700, Ch ina) . Her research area is comparative literature. Emai:l su uoqin chocolate@ 163. com # # (The W izard of Oz ) 1900 , 20 L% % ( The W izard of Oz ) , , 1942 , 1947, , ∀ , , , , , (The W iz ard of Oz ) , , ∀ , , , 222 世界文学评论 ,