改良吸氧装置与传统吸氧装置在人工气道优化中的临床效果比较.pdfVIP

窑486 窑 2015年4月第22卷第4期 窑论著窑 渊护理研究冤 改良吸氧装置与传统吸氧装置在人工气道优化中的 临床效果比较 张春桂袁 高娟玲袁 樊桂娟 渊广西梧州市工人医院袁 广西梧州 543001冤 揖摘要铱 目的 对比分析改良吸氧装置与传统吸氧装置在人工气道优化管理中的临床效果遥 方法 选取2011年1月至2013年 12月我院诊治的建立人工气道患者68例为研究对象袁 将其随机分为两组各34例遥 对照组使用传统的吸氧装置进行气道湿化袁 实 验组使用改良吸氧装置遥 观察比较两组患者的出血率尧 气道黏膜损坏率尧 舒适度尧 满意度以及临床治疗效果遥 结果 实验组患者 的出血率 渊5.88%冤 和气道黏膜损坏率 渊2.94%冤 均明显低于对照组的32.35%和35.29%袁 舒适度 渊85.29%冤 和满意度 渊82.35%冤 均明显高于对照组的26.47%和32.35%袁 治疗总有效率 渊82.35%冤 明显高于对照组的47.06%袁 差异均具有统计学意义 渊P 0.05冤遥 结论 改良吸氧装置使气道黏膜处于良好的湿化状态袁 利于呼吸道分泌物稀释排除袁 到达理想的气道净化效果遥 揖关键词铱 改良吸氧装置曰 传统吸氧装置曰 人工气道曰 优化管理 中图分类号院 砸源苑猿援5 文献标识码院 粤 doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4659.2015.04.0486 A Comparisonof ClinicalEffectofImprovedOxygenDevice andTraditionalOxygenDevice inImprovingArtificialAirway ZHANG Chungui,GAOJuanling, FAN Guijuan (Wuzhou WorkersHospital, Wuzhou543001, China) [Abstract] Objective To compare and analyze the clinical effect of improved oxygen device and traditional oxygen device in improving artificial airway. Methods 68 patients with artificial airway treated in our hospital from January 2011 to December 2013 were selected and randomly divided into two groups. The control group (34 cases) was given conventional oxygen device for airway humidification, the experimental group (34 cases) was given improved oxygen device. The bleeding rate, airway mucous damage rate, comfort rate, satisfaction and clinical effect of the two groups were observed and compared. Results In the experimental group, the bleeding rate (5.88%) and airway mucous damage rate (2.94%) were significantly lower than 32.35%and 35.29%in the control group, the comfort rate (85.29%) and satisfaction rate (82.35%) were significantly higher than 26.47%and 32.35%in the control group, the total effective rate (82.35%) w