Writinganalgebraforthesocialsciences-DiscourseUnit.docVIP

Writinganalgebraforthesocialsciences-DiscourseUnit.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Writinganalgebraforthesocialsciences-DiscourseUnit.doc

WRITING AN ALGEBRA FOR THE SOCIAL SCIENCES: FREUD’S AND LACAN’S MATHEMES Carlos Gómez There was an epistemic revolution at the time psychoanalysis was becoming a field of knowledge. In the middle of the nineteenth century the scientific community was debating the status of what would be called Natural Sciences (Naturwissenschaften) and the Sciences of the Spirit (Geisteswisseschaften.) Psychoanalysis was not able to evade this debate at the time Freud was establishing its foundations. Referring ourselves to this debate is not mere entertainment since it is about thinking how psychoanalysis faces social research. Through these lines we will try to show the founding efforts of both Sigmund Freud and Jacques Lacan to give psychoanalysis a rigorous status, particularly in regard of social issues. This is where the emphasis of this article is situated. The two key words in the dispute between Natural Sciences and Sciences of the Spirit are the verbs to explain (erkl?ren) and to understand (verstehen). We know the debate was due to the emergence of Hermeneutics and the argument that scientific strictness in Sciences of the Spirit would be precisely in interpretation and understanding as verstehen. Carl Menger (1990) and Wilhelm Dilthey (1989) are paradigmatic examples of this position. Rickert and Windelband reconsidered this issue as a separation between “Sciences of Culture” and “Sciences of Nature” or as “Nomothetic Sciences” and “Ideographic Sciences.” Years later, Karl Jaspers, a contemporary of Freud, applied such a distinction in his General Psychology to state that the issue in Psychology is to understand/interpret, not to explain (1997.) This debate was contemporary in time and space to psychoanalysis. The question is then: what side should psychoanalysis be on according to Freud? This is where we find Freud’s originality. In his obstinacy for labeling his psychoanalysis as a Natural Science (Naturwissenschaft) he openly avoids the question, he simply ignores

文档评论(0)

***** + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档