FinalReporttotheNSF-DepartmentofComputerScience-Cornell.doc

FinalReporttotheNSF-DepartmentofComputerScience-Cornell.doc

  1. 1、本文档共8页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
FinalReporttotheNSF-DepartmentofComputerScience-Cornell.doc

Final Report to the NSF: The Open Citations Project: Integrating and Navigating Eprint Archives through Citation Linking Project Number IIS-9907892 Project Background and Motivation For decades there have been frequent and intense discussions about the real and potential effects that open access to research papers may have on the scholarly community and associated communities (government and industrial laboratories, educators, etc.). While some of these discussions precede the Internet, certainly the rapid emergence of the Web has amplified them. The ability of the Web to immediately broadcast research results combined with the increased rapidity of results in many fields have added new pressure on publishers, scholarly societies, libraries, and other information intermediaries to development new solutions. The recognition of the Web as a technical foundation for new publishing solutions has led to a number of changes in scholarly publishing of the last decade. A class of new alternatives collectively known as Eprint Archives has emerged that offer scholars the opportunity to self archive research papers without the mediation of traditional publishers. Some well-known instances of these eprint archives include the physics arXiv developed originally at Los Alamos National Laboratory and run now at Cornell University, the CogPrints archive for cognitive sciences run out of University of Southampton, the Cryptology ePrint Archive run out of UCSD, and the more journal-oriented BioMed Central. A few of these, most notably arXiv, have led to structural changes in scholarly exchange in their target communities. These new publishing solutions raise important questions in a number of areas. What are the economic models for these archives? How do these new publishing vehicles interact with traditional models for academic promotion and tenure? How does peer review as a vehicle for quality assurance transfer to this new domain? What are the cultural barriers within sp

文档评论(0)

ailuojue + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档