- 1、本文档共8页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
FinalReporttotheNSF-DepartmentofComputerScience-Cornell.doc
Final Report to the NSF:
The Open Citations Project:
Integrating and Navigating Eprint Archives
through Citation Linking
Project Number IIS-9907892
Project Background and Motivation
For decades there have been frequent and intense discussions about the real and potential effects that open access to research papers may have on the scholarly community and associated communities (government and industrial laboratories, educators, etc.). While some of these discussions precede the Internet, certainly the rapid emergence of the Web has amplified them. The ability of the Web to immediately broadcast research results combined with the increased rapidity of results in many fields have added new pressure on publishers, scholarly societies, libraries, and other information intermediaries to development new solutions.
The recognition of the Web as a technical foundation for new publishing solutions has led to a number of changes in scholarly publishing of the last decade. A class of new alternatives collectively known as Eprint Archives has emerged that offer scholars the opportunity to self archive research papers without the mediation of traditional publishers. Some well-known instances of these eprint archives include the physics arXiv developed originally at Los Alamos National Laboratory and run now at Cornell University, the CogPrints archive for cognitive sciences run out of University of Southampton, the Cryptology ePrint Archive run out of UCSD, and the more journal-oriented BioMed Central. A few of these, most notably arXiv, have led to structural changes in scholarly exchange in their target communities.
These new publishing solutions raise important questions in a number of areas. What are the economic models for these archives? How do these new publishing vehicles interact with traditional models for academic promotion and tenure? How does peer review as a vehicle for quality assurance transfer to this new domain? What are the cultural barriers within sp
您可能关注的文档
- As系列超声波清洗器使用说明书-中国分析仪器网.doc
- ATalkonEconometrics.ppt
- attachments201302201302220924426.ppt.ppt
- AuditReportWriting.ppt
- AVR单片机课程论文-沿壁小车组员孟晓东陶丙山刘清源一、设计目的.doc
- A同理心訓練.ppt
- A带安全阀WithsecurityvalveB.ppt
- A.新式交通工具的.ppt
- BehandlingslinjeforbarnogungemedADHDiOslo-Lovisenberg.doc
- Benjeeenanafabeet-DeDigitaleSchool.doc
最近下载
- 《矿山企业温室气体排放核算方法与报告指南(试行)》.docx
- JGJ_T496-2022 房屋建筑统一编码与基本属性数据标准.docx
- [金属冶金标准]GBT 14506.8-2010 硅酸盐岩石化学分析方法 第8部分:二氧化钛量测定.pdf
- 掘进安全管理课件.pptx
- 钢平台验收记录表.docx
- IPC-2221C-EN TOC2023印制版设计通用标准 Generic Standard on Printed Board Design.pdf
- 小学数学《图形的运动》作业设计.docx
- 看课件-成人气道异物梗阻救护.ppt
- 中职旅游类《前厅服务与管理》职教高考必备试题库(含答案).docx
- 公务员平时考核评鉴表(空表).pdf VIP
文档评论(0)