1400451-终稿.docxVIP

基于叙词分析的高被引与零被引论文选题差异研究——兼谈标准叙词索引与引文索引数据的混合应用1）钟 镇，21. 河南工业大学管理学院 郑州 450001；2. 河南师范大学科技与社会研究所，新乡453007[摘 要] 为验证论文选题与论文影响力之间的相关性，利用Web of Science数据库提供的引文索引数据与CAB数据库提供的叙词索引数据，以高频叙词作为热点依据，比较了9种农业经济与政策SCI源期刊高被引论文与零被引论文的选题。研究结果显示，绝大多数期刊的高被引论文在总体上都有着比零被引论文更高的热点叙词分配率，说明热点选题对于论文影响力的提升有着的积极影响。本文还对叙词索引数据应用以及知识图谱绘制的阈值参数选取等与研究结论相关的问题进行了讨论。[关键词] 叙词分析 选题差异 CAB数据库 零被引论文 热点叙词分配率[中图分类号] G644 [文献标志码] AThe difference of topic selection between highly cited papers and non-cited papers based on thesaurus analysis——the hybrid application of citation index and thesaurus index Zhong Zhen1,21. School of Management, University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China; 2. Institute for Science, Technology Society, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China[Abstract] According to the frequently occurring descriptors from CAB thesaurus and citation data from Web of Science, this paper gave a topic selection comparing between highly cited papers and non-cited papers for the reason to verify the relationship between topic selection and citation impact. The sample was extracted from 9 agricultural economics policy SCI source journals. The results showed that there was larger proportion of allocation on hotspot descriptors from thesaurus on most of journals, which indicated hot topic selection contributed to the citation impact of papers. The paper also gave a discussion on the application of thesaurus, threshold selection on knowledge mapping and other topics related to the results.[Keywords] thesaurus analysis; difference of topic selection; CAB database; non-cited papers; allocation ratio on hotspot descriptors from thesaurus1. 引言基于引文与关键词的领域研究热点分析与研究前沿发现是目前信息计量学及其相近学科的重要研究方向和研究热点[1-3]，这其中很多成果实际已经暗含了一种假设——即热点研究选题有助于论文影响力提升。然而，当我们试图通过文献检索得到该假设的实证量化验证依据时，却收获有限。这其中较为相关的成果来自文献[4]，作者将3种农业作物研究期刊论文划分到14个规模不同的子学科中，根据CNKI数据库提供的被引频次，统计了不同子学科的论文数、被引频次与篇均被引频次，指出3种同学科期刊有着不同的研究主题倾向，且不同主题有着不同的学术影响力。然后，该文献也没有正面回答上面所说的假设。因此，本文希望通过比较明确且具备可操作性的文献计量指标，尝试验证热点选题是否助于论文影响力的提升