- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
争取论文发表的十大简则
争取论文发表的十大简则
规则一:阅读很多论文,从成功的和失败的两方面汲取经验。
规则二:对您自己的论文越客观,最终的结果越好。
规则三:优秀的编者和审者会客观对待您的论文。
规则四:如果您英文写作不佳,提早补习,将受益终身。
规则五:学会与退稿为伴。
规则六:好的科学“元素”显而易见——新颖的研究主题,广泛的涉猎相关文献,好的数据,好的分析,包括强有力的统计学支持和发人深思讨论。好的科学报道其“元素”也显而易见——完美的结构、恰当的使用图表、适当的篇幅长度、为目标读者而写。切勿忽视这些显而易见的“元素”。
规则七:当有解决问题的思想火花迸发时,就开始撰稿。
规则八:在职业生涯之初就成为评阅人。
规则九:提早决定去哪里发表论文。
规则十:质量是一切。
笔者将以上“发文十律”总结为十句打油诗,谨供参考,欢迎雅正。
客观为文结硕果,多读博采成败经。
优秀审编善对文,早补英文益终生。
坦然面对退稿信,广评他文益自身。
灵感迸发就动笔,动笔之前刊选定。
好科学加好写作,质量优异铸真金。
阿宽编译
2008-06-18
附原著:Ten Simple Rules for Getting Published
Ten Simple Rules for Getting Published
Philip E. Bourne is Editor-in-Chief of PLoS Computational Biology. E-mail: bourne@
The student council of the International Society for Computational Biology asked me to present my thoughts on getting published in the field of computational biology at the Intelligent Systems in Molecular Biology conference held in Detroit in late June of 2005. Close to 200 bright young souls and a few not so young crammed into a small room for what proved to be a wonderful interchange among a group of whom approximately one-half had yet to publish their first paper. The advice I gave that day I have modified and present as ten rules for getting published.
Rule 1: Read many papers, and learn from both the good and the bad work of others.
It is never too early to become a critic. Journal clubs, where you critique a paper as a group, are excellent for having this kind of dialogue. Reading at least two papers a day in detail not just in your area of research and thinking about their quality will also help. Being well read has another potential major benefit—it facilitates a more objective view of ones own work. It is too easy after many late nights spent in front of a computer screen and/or laboratory bench to convince yourself that your work is the best invention since sliced bread. More than likely it is not, and your mentor is prone to falling into the same trap, hence rule 2.
Rule 2: The more objective you can be about your work, the better th
文档评论(0)