56例急诊心肌梗死患者临床诊治分析.docVIP

56例急诊心肌梗死患者临床诊治分析 　　[摘要] 目的 探讨急诊科收治的心肌梗死患者采用静脉药物溶栓和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术两种方式后的临床治疗效果，并对心肌梗死的临床治疗起到指导作用。 方法 择取该院急诊科于2013年6月―2014年5月收治的56例心肌梗死患者，按不同的急诊方式将这些患者分为人数相同的治疗组与参照组两组，分别行以PCI介入术与静脉药物溶栓两种治疗方法，并对临床效果进行观察和分析。 结果 通过对临床效果的观察发现，治疗组全部治愈，总有效率可以达到100%，参照组的28例患者有7例无效，总有效率为75.0%，差异有统计学意义（P0.05）。 结论 PCI介入术的疗效比静脉药物溶栓方法的疗效更佳显著，急诊科进行心肌梗死治疗时应选择PCI介入术。 　　[关键词] 急诊；心肌梗死；临床诊治 　　[中图分类号] R3 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742（2015）06（a）-0032-02 　　Clinical Analysis of Treatment for 56 Cases of Emergency Patients with Myocardial Infarction 　　XU Dong-mei 　　Emergency Department， the Peoples Hospital of Shangzhi City，Shangzhi， Heilongjiang Province， 150000 China 　　[Abstract] Objective To investigate clinical therapeutic effect of thrombolysis therapy and percutaneous coronary artery interventional therapy in the treatment of patients with myocardial infarction in Emergency Department and provide guidance for its treatment. Methods The emergency department of our hospital from 2013 June to 2014 May， selected from 56 cases of patients with myocardial infarction， according to different emergency way these patients were divided into the same number of two groups， respectively for interventional treatment for two patients with the method of thrombolysis with PCI， and the clinical effects were observed and analyzed. Results Through the observation on the clinical effect of discovery， the total efficiency of the treatment group can reach 100%， the reference group total effectiveness is 75%， the difference of P 0.05， with statistical significance； in the respect such as hospitalization time， complications and mortality rate of patients with recurrent rate， PCI group is much lower than the reference group of thrombolysis the difference， （P 0.05）， with statistical significance. Conclusion The curative effect of PCI intervention efficacy is obviously better than that of thrombolysis method， the emergency department for treatment of myocardial infarction should choose PCI intervention. 　　[Key words] Eme