- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
同期推量调强放疗与序贯推量调强放疗治疗老年局晚期非小细胞肺癌的效果比较.doc
同期推量调强放疗与序贯推量调强放疗治疗老年局晚期非小细胞肺癌的效果比较
[摘要] 目的 比较老年局晚期非小细胞肺癌(LA-NSCLC)患者采取同期推量调强放疗(SIB-IMRT)与序贯推量调强放疗(SEQ-IMRT)的效果。 方法 回顾性分析徐州医学院附属医院2010年1月~2014年10月住院的56例老年LA-NSCLC患者,随机分为治疗组(28例,采用SIB-IMRT)和对照组(28例,采用SEQ-IMRT)。比较两组患者放疗计划不同参数的剂量及两组患者的近期疗效和急性毒副反应。 结果 SIB-IMRT组肿瘤靶区内生物等效剂量(BED)(95.3±4.7)Gy高于SEQ-IMRT组的(86.4±3.2)Gy,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);两组靶区肺受照相关体积、肺平均受照剂量、脊髓受照最大剂量、心脏受照相关体积比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗组总有效率(CR+PR)为82.1%,对照组总有效率为46.4%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 SIB-IMRT与SEQ-IMRT治疗老年LA-NSCLC,前者可获得理想的剂量分布,可提高肿瘤靶区内的BED且未增加周围危及器官剂量,可提高近期疗效且急性毒副反应无增加。
[关键词] 非小细胞肺癌;放射治疗;调强放疗;剂量学
[中图分类号] R734.2 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2015)09(b)-0042-04
Effect comparison of SIB-IMRT and SEQ-IMRT for the treatment of elderly patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer
WU Yang1 LI Liang1 YU Hong-min2
1.Department of Radiotherapy,Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical College,Xuzhou 221002,China;2.Public Health of Xuzhou Medical College School,Xuzhou 221004,China
[Abstract] Objective To compare the radiotherapy effect between SIB-IMRT and SEQ-IMRT in treating elderly patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). Methods 56 Patients with LA-NSCLC from January 2010 to October 2014 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed.Patients were randomly divided into treatment group (n=28) and control group (n=28).The control group were given SEQ-IMRT and the treatment group were given SIB-IMRT.Then the dosimetry of different parameters in radiotherapy plans,efficacy and acute toxicities between two groups was compared respectively. Results The BED of tumor target zone in treatment group was (95.3±4.7)Gy,significantly higher than that of (86.4±3.2)Gy in control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P0.05).There were no statistically significant between two groups in target illuminated lung volume,mean lung dose,the maximum dose of spinal cord illuminated and heart illuminated volume(P0.05).The total efficacy rate was 82.1% in treatment group an
原创力文档


文档评论(0)