- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
后腹腔镜下输尿管切开取石内置引流术的护理.doc
后腹腔镜下输尿管切开取石内置引流术的护理
摘要:目的:探讨后腹腔镜下输尿管切开取石内置引流术临床护理内容。方法:选取2013年12月至2015年1月间我院收治的输尿管结石患者,共计76例。将上述患者均分为护理组和对照组,各38例,采用不同护理方法对比各自疗效情况。结果:护理组中满意例数19例,一般例数17例,不满意2例,满意度94.7%;对照组中满意例数11例,一般例数15例,不满意13例,满意度68.4%。护理组手术时间为81.3min,术中出血两位34.9ml,并发生发生2例;对照组手术时间为120.7min,术中出血两位83.0ml,并发生发生12例。比较发现护理组满意度以及手术护理情况显著优于对照组患者,差异具有显著性,P0.01。结论:对实施后腹腔镜下输尿管切开取石内置引流术的患者进行良好的护理能有效提高临床治疗护理效果。该方法临床效果显著,临床研究过程中未发现严重不良反应。
关键词:后腹腔镜;输尿管切开取石内置引流术;护理效果;
Abstract:Objective:To explore the clinical nursing intervention for internal-tube drainage of ureterolithotomy under the retroperitoneal laparoscopy. Method:76 patients with ureteral calculus treated from December 2013 to January 2015 in our hospital were selected. The patients were divided into nursing group and control group, 38 cases each group. Based on the different nursing methods, the curative effect of two groups was compared. Result: The nursing group had 19 satisfied cases, 17 general cases and 2 unsatisfactory cases; the satisfaction rate was 94.7%. The control group had 11 satisfied cases, 15 general cases and 13 unsatisfactory cases; the satisfaction rate was 68.4%. For nursing group, the operation time was 81.3min; the intraoperative hemorrhage was 34.9ml; there were 2 cases with complications. For control group, the operation time was 120.7min; the intraoperative hemorrhage was 83.0ml; there were 12 cases with complications. According to the comparison results, the satisfaction and nursing condition of nursing group was significantly better than that of control group (P0.01).Conclusion: For patients of receiving the internal-tube drainage of ureterolithotomy under the retroperitoneal laparoscopy, the favorable nursing can effectively improve the clinical treatment effects. There are no serious adverse reactions during the clinical research process.
Keywords: Retroperitoneal Laparoscopy; Internal-Tube Drainage Of Ureterolithotomy; Nursing Effect
近年来,随着社会的不断发展以及人们生活方式的不断变化,各类疾病发生情况显著增加,其中以输尿管结石较为严重。该疾病是临床较为常见的泌尿科病症,
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 《念奴娇赤壁怀古》课件.pptx VIP
- 《线性代数》(陈建龙等)第三章 线性方程组.ppt VIP
- 2025年初中物理课程标准(2022版)考试模拟试卷及答案(共三套).docx
- 城市快速路系统工程冬季施工方案.pdf VIP
- 施耐德_ELAU PacDrive-3-故障代码.pdf VIP
- 2025年重庆市《安全员》C3证考试题库(含答案) .pdf VIP
- 模型试验在土力学与基础工程课程教学中的应用.pdf VIP
- 掘进与支护(第二版)课件:煤巷、半煤岩巷及特殊掘巷法.pptx
- 基于AHP-熵权法的建筑工程经济课程教学策略优化研究.pdf VIP
- 基于BIM技术的独立学院混凝土结构课程教学改革研究.pdf VIP
原创力文档


文档评论(0)