重度颅脑损伤患者ICU治疗临床观察.docVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
重度颅脑损伤患者ICU治疗临床观察.doc

重度颅脑损伤患者ICU治疗临床观察   【摘要】 目的:探究重度颅脑损伤患者ICU临床治疗的方法及效果。方法:随机选取2010年1月-2013年1月在本院治疗的重度颅脑损伤患者82例,随机数字表法分成治疗组与对照组,每组41例,其中对照组给予常规治疗,包括营养支持、止血、采用脱水降颅压,以及改善脑循环、糖皮质激素与纠正水电解质酸碱平衡、合理应用抗生素等,而治疗组在常规治疗的基础上,给予颅内压监测、机械通气、循环支持及亚低温治疗等,对比分析治疗前后两组患者的临床疗效。结果:治疗组41例患者治疗良好23例,中度病残、重度病残及植物生存分别为8、6、3例,死亡1例,总有效率为75.6%,对照组41例患者治疗良好15例,中度病残、重度病残及植物生存分别为6、5、8例,死亡7例,总有效率为51.2%,两组患者的总有效率比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05),治疗组的效果明显优于对照组。结论:对于重度颅脑损伤患者来说,尽早诊断及治疗,并在ICU内综合治疗,可取得显著的治疗效果。   【关键词】 重度颅脑损伤; ICU; 临床治疗; 观察   【Abstract】 Objective: To explore the method and effect of clinical treatment of ICU patients with severe craniocerebral injury. Method: 82 patients with severe craniocerebral injury in our hospital were randomly selected from January 2010 to January 2013,and were randomly divided into treatment group and control group , 41 cases in each group.The control group was given conventional treatment, including nutritional support, hemostatic, by lowering the intracranial pressure, and improved cerebral circulation, glucocorticoid and correct water electrolyte and acid-base balance, reasonable use of antibiotics and so on, while the treatment group on the basis of conventional therapy,was given the intracranial pressure monitoring, mechanical ventilation, circulation support and mild hypothermia treatment, the clinical efficacy of the two groups before and after treatment were comparative analyzed.Result:The treatment group patients of good were 23 cases, moderate disability, severe disability and plant survival were respectively 8, 6 and 3 cases, 1 cases died, the total effective rate was 75.6%.The control group 41 patients treated with good in 15 cases, moderate disability, severe disability and plant survival were respectively 6, 5 and 8 cases, 7 cases died, the total effective rate was 51.2%. Compared the total efficiency of two groups, the difference was statistically significant(P0.05),the effect of the treatment group was significantly better than the control group.Conclusion: For patients with seve

文档评论(0)

ganpeid + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档