手术与非手术治疗无骨折脱位型颈髓损伤的疗效.docVIP

手术与非手术治疗无骨折脱位型颈髓损伤的疗效.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
手术与非手术治疗无骨折脱位型颈髓损伤的疗效.doc

手术与非手术治疗无骨折脱位型颈髓损伤的疗效   【摘 要】目的:探讨手术与非手术治疗无骨折脱位型颈髓损伤的临床效果。 方法:回顾性分析41例无骨折脱位型颈髓损伤病例,其中19例行非手术治疗,22例行手术治疗,比较两组患者治疗前后ASIA损害分级、JOA评分及神经功能改善情况,评价治疗效果。 结果:非手术组和手术组治疗后ASIA损害分级、JOA评分均较治疗前提高;手术组治疗后3月及12月时神经功能改善率分别为(40±21)%和(59±30)%,非手术组同期神经改善率为(26±13)%和(42±27)%,手术组比非手术组神经功能改善明显,差异具有显著性意义(P?0.05)。 结论:手术与非手术均能较好的治疗无骨折脱位型颈髓损伤,但手术治疗效果更为确切。   【关键词】无骨折脱位;颈髓损伤;治疗;疗效   【中图分类号】R651.2 【文献标识码】A 【文章编号】1004-7484(2014)06-3472-02   The Clinical outcomes of Operative and non-operative Methods in the treatment of the   cervical spinal cord injury without fracture and dislocation   SHEN Ying-chun, ZOU De-bo*   ( *Department of Spine, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250014, P.R. China)   【Abstract】 Objective:To discuss the clinical outcomes of operative and non-operative methods in the treatment of cervical spinal cord injury without fracture and dislocation. Methods:The total of 45 patients with cervical spinal cord injury without fracture and dislocation treated were retrospectively analyzed, including 21 patients treated non-operatively, 24 patients treated operatively. The ASIA impairment scale and JOA scores of the two groups were compared, clinical effects were observed. Results:The ASIA impairment scale and JOA scores of the non-operative and operative groups were improved significantly compared to those of non-treatment. The curative probability of nerve function of the operative group in 3 month and 12 month after treatment was (40±21)% and (59±30)% respectively, while those of non-operative group in the same time was (26±13)% and (42±27)% respectively. The operative group got better nerve function than that of the non-operative group, and the difference between the two groups was significant statistically. Conclusions:The methods of both operative and non-operative could get better clinical outcomes in the treatment of patients of cervical spinal cord injury without fracture and dislocation, however, the operation is preferable.   【key

文档评论(0)

lmother_lt + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档