独立行政法人の独立行政法人による独立行政法人のための評価.pptVIP

A Novel Evaluation System of Public Research Institute in Japan International Workshop on the Evaluation of Publicly Funded ResearchBerlin, 26-27 September 2005 Naoto KobayashiNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) Pattern of Outcome Creation(Database Type) Evaluationfrom the viewpoint of outcome to reflect the future  Evaluation of Roadmapto make sure the research strategy Example of Roadmap for Outcomes:　Ultra-Low-Loss power devices　 Evaluation of Output Indexes to know the level of research unit Evaluation of Management Mid-term Objectives by the minister (e.g. METI) Evaluation is for Encouraging with Love. Evaluation is for Communication. Evaluation is for Strategy. Evaluation is for Creation. Evaluation is to be fed back. Evaluation reflects the Future. Appendix Definition of independent administrative institution 【Performance】 - to be highly public - need not to be performed by government directly - hard to be achieved by private organization independently ① effective and with high quality ② independent ③ open  ① To perform effectively  and qualitatively - to set mid-term objectives and to receive periodical evaluation by third party - to entrust some service to private organization or to abolish institutions - to manage as a private corporation - to organize minimum size ② To perform independently to concentrate authority to president to exclude the excess involvement of minister to have an appropriate personnel including executives from private corporation Notes: Evaluation is like a Compass for Voyage. Thank you ! ③ To perform openly - to open all performances and achievements  to the public CONTENTS Missions and Principles of AIST Evaluation Policy in AIST Novel Evaluation System from the Viewpoint of Outcome Evaluation in the Future for the Publicly Funded Research Institutes Interdisciplinary Researches to enable to plan long-range government