Loyaty and Fidelity in Translation.pptVIP

Effect Equivalence Does the TT have the same effects on the target audience as the ST on the source audience? If the answer is positive, if the range of effects on the readers is the same in the ST and the TT, then functionally, the text has been translated successfully and the concept of untranslatability is irrelevant. 葬扣圃来浅叭盐涅呐六揖萍暮釉陨蓉浦捍钟隅凄估拱阁戒尘嫡藤旦唇黍化Loyalty and Fidelity in TranslationLoyalty and Fidelity in Translation Literality or adaptation? However, there is a danger in asserting that the translator is free to adapt the text if he encounters difficulties to translate it. The objectives, intentions and interests of the author must be preserved as best as possible, that’s why the translator will ethically always try to find an acceptable balance between literality and adaptation. 侨夜附作拟坎扯擦病赋郊痢艳瞅雷斥咖晚践剩瞳兴芬孽遍惯湿薪逐乐斧器Loyalty and Fidelity in TranslationLoyalty and Fidelity in Translation Literality or Adaptation? “A translation must be as literal as possible and as free as necessary.” The function of the translation will determine the translator’s strategy: Is it a semantic or a communicative translation? 柔孝酶爆讲路漫芽挡演角被菏烟末雄契严托狸瞳教芍妖蔼坤祸浅裳违雷雀Loyalty and Fidelity in TranslationLoyalty and Fidelity in Translation The Translator’s roles Translating is an act of reading (“the most intimate act of reading” G. Spivak), of understanding - requires knowledge -, of appropriation, of recontextualization, but is also cultural mediation and creative writing. The translator is at the same time scribe, servant, and creative writer. The communication situation will influence his/her decisions. No ultimate truth of a text: multiple possible translations = the translator as musician 匡俗独禽膝苑匙舍锐辽赎睫架掖吐刊抹踌庸厌年苟卓处咬猎当琴模貉屡由Loyalty and Fidelity in TranslationLoyalty and Fidelity in Translation Choice of words Melbourne 400km 疏廷蔑狭辫贼弄数澎洁燥翱孟简熬脯禹贫泉皮华哪横财竞总钡棚颓摹坯藉Loyalty and Fidelity in TranslationLoyalty and Fidelity in Translation Choice of Words Does the author consciously choose his/h