护理质量持续改进在子宫肌瘤护理中的应用.docVIP

护理质量持续改进在子宫肌瘤护理中的应用.doc

  1. 1、本文档共8页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
护理质量持续改进在子宫肌瘤护理中的应用   [摘要] 目的 评价护理质量持续改进在子宫肌瘤护理中的效果。 方法 选择2008年11月~2012年3月首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院收治的子宫肌瘤患者86例作为研究对象,将其随机分为观察组和对照组,每组各43例。对照组采用一般常规护理,观察组在常规护理基础上护理质量持续改进,比较两组临床疗效和生活质量,并对两组护理质量进行考核比较。 结果 观察组痊愈16例,有效23例,总有效率为90.69%,对照组痊愈12例,有效22例,总有效率为79.07%,两组总有效率比较,差异有高度统计学意义(Ridit Z = 36.954,P = 0.000);护理干预后,两组在生理、心理、社会、疾病、满意度及生活质量评分总分方面均有明显好转,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05),观察组好转程度优于对照组(P 0.05或P 0.01);实施护理质量持续改进后,观察组在基础护理、护理安全、病房管理、消毒隔离、护理文书和急救物品方面改善均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。 结论 护理质量持续改进可以不断提高护理人员服务质量,提高患者生活质量,在子宫肌瘤护理中效果显著。   [关键词] 子宫肌瘤;持续质量改进;护理   [中图分类号] R197.32 [文献标识码] C [文章编号] 1673-7210(2014)01(b)-0129-03   Application of nursing quality continuous improvement in uterine leiomyoma care   LI Lanping   Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing 100006, China   [Abstract] Objective To investigate the effect of nursing quality continuous improvement in uterine leiomyoma care. Methods 86 patients from November 2008 to March 2012 in Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University were selected as study objects, and they were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 43 patients in each group. The control group was given the routine nursing and the observation group was given the routine nursing and the nursing quality was continuously improved. The clinical efficacy and quality of life of two groups were compared, and the nursing quality assessment were analyzed. Results After nursing intervention, in the observation group, recovery was 16 cases, effective was 23 cases, the total effective rate was 90.69%; in control group, recovery was 12 cases, effective was 22 cases, the total effective rate was 79.07%, total effective rates in the two groups was high statistically significant difference (Ridit Z = 36.954, P = 0.000); the physiological, psychological, social, disease, satisfaction, and total score of two groups were improved significantly, the differences were statisti

文档评论(0)

lnainai_sj + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档