22-09-0216-02-0000-proposed-resolutions-to-comments-related-to-security-in-802-22-draftv2-0.docVIP
- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
IEEE P802.22Wireless RANs
Proposed Resolutions to Comments Related to Security in 802.22 Draft v2.0 Date: 2009-11-13 Author(s): Name Company Address Phone email Apurva Mody BAE Systems P.O. Box 868, MER 15-2350, Nashua, NH 03061-0868 603-885-2621
404-819-0314 apurva.mody@,
apurva_mody@ Tom Kiernan US Army (CERDEC) Ft Monmouth, NJ - Thomas.kiernan@ Ranga Reddy US Army (CERDEC) Ft. Monmouth, NJ Ranga.reddy@
Remaining security comments that need to be resolved:
298, 356, 361, 1346, 403, 404, 407, 473, 474, 505, 506, 508, 509
Comments 298, 356, 361, 1346, 403, 404, 407 were assigned to the Security ad-hoc by the MAC ad-hoc. Comments 473, 474, 505, 506, 508, 509, 511, 512, 523 are related to security issues, and should be handled by the Security ad-hoc as well.
Comments 674, 717, 719, 725, 726, 731, 732 are comments deferred during Security ad-hoc calls. Discussion on those comments are provided here
Comment 298 – Gerald Chouinard
Comment:
Why are the CBP burst to be protected. Arent they broadcast packets by definition for inter-cell coexistence among different WRAN cells. If these cells belong to the same network that needs protection, everything could be done over the backhaul.
Suggested Remedy:
Reconsider the need for security on the CBP bursts since any WRAN operator will need to know how to decode it to act upon it and therefore will be able to mess with it and change the text accordingly.
Resolution (as currently discussed):
Problem is from malicious users creating false CBP bursts. Since any WRAN operator will need to know how to decode these CBP bursts to act upon it, they will therefore be able to mess with it. What is the need for securing these CBP bursts then? Also, the bursts giving identity as per the FCC RO would need to be in the clear. Assigned to the security ad-hoc group for resolution.
Initial Feedback from Security Adhoc:
Currently the CBP bursts are transmitted in the clear. They contain a signature at the end of the
您可能关注的文档
- 21世纪人类健康家庭必备.doc
- 21997981肝特异性对比剂.doc
- 21世纪全球经济复苏势头与面临风险.doc
- 21世纪教育网普通区模板.doc
- 21世纪大英3英译汉和写作.doc
- 21世纪翻译答案.doc
- 21业务运营风险.doc
- 21原始人的创造.doc
- 21咽科病人护理.doc
- 21城市结构(定稿).doc
- 22-09-0216-03-0000-proposed-resolutions-to-comments-related-to-security-in-802-22-draftv2-0.doc
- 22-10-0034-01-0000-proposed-resolutions-to-comments-related-to-section-9-2.doc
- 22-10-0051-00-0000-proposed-resolutions-to-comments-related-to-sections-9-6-and-9-7.doc
- 22-10-0051-01-0000-proposed-resolutions-to-comments-related-to-sections-9-6-and-9-7.doc
- 22-10-0116-00-0000-proposed-modifications-related-to-qp-scheduling.doc
- 22-2-2反证法.doc
- 22-10-0084-02-0000-proposed-resolutions-to-comments-related-to-section-9.doc
- 22-10-0084-04-0000-proposed-resolutions-to-comments-related-to-section-9.doc
- 22-10-0084-03-0000-proposed-resolutions-to-comments-related-to-section-9.doc
- 22-脊椎动物的主要类群3-2.doc
文档评论(0)